The phrases "in the street" and "on the street" are sometimes interchangeable in the English language but they have distinct meanings.
"In the street" could be used for something literally "in" the street. For examples:
In the US and English language "in the middle of" often precedes "street" in our spoken and written language.
In the USA, our houses are "on" a street, we drive "on" a street, we live "on" a street, we walk "on" a street, etc.
Overseas, they might use "in".
Ex. I live in Briar Close Lane. (a street)
The phrase "had already left" is grammatically correct. The phrase "had already been gone" is not grammatically correct.
It actually would be phrased as "who all had."
The correct phrase is "The sour milk stinks."
The correct phrase is "We hold these truths to be self-evident,...." The primary author of the United States Declaration of Independence was Thomas Jefferson.
It is an incorrect (and inappropriate) phrase used in place of the correct phrase "squall line". The phrase "squall line" refers to:Squall line A line of intense thunderstorm cells parallel to and ahead of a fast-moving well-defined cold front.
rallying on the street.
'In the hope that' is the correct phrase.
This is not a sentence it is a phrase and as a phrase it is correct.
It depends on the situation. "My house is on the street that runs parallel to the freeway" "If you stand in the street watch out for oncoming cars." Both are correct.
I walked down the street. "down the street" is a prepositiional phrase.
That is the correct spelling of "phrase" (word group, or to use specific words).
"At 110 Deer Street" is correct.
The correct phrase is "sufficient proof".
If you are referring to this sentence, no, it does not resemble a correct phrase AT ALL.
It depends on how you use the phrase: Can you provide me a copy of your CV? - correct
No, the correct phrase is veni vidi vici.
yes it's correct. is a phrase..