The Civil War instated the dominance of parliament as the head of British politics and law, and with its return the monarchy demoted to a head of state. Theoretically this gave the people more power, in fact it more gave the lords power.
Another key thing to note is that from this war, parliament gained control of the army for the first time. This meant that it would be up to Parliamnet where and when Britain would fight wars. This also led to the beginning of the new model army, the first professional army in the world.
The freedom from a monarch opened up political thought on what could replace it, those ideas encouraged the French Revolution and others and spread around the world.
So, without the civil war, today Britain might still be an authoritarian monarchical state instead of the representative democracy that we have, although it seems more likely something would have changed eventually
In the 17th century, the English Civil War (a set of three distinct conflicts occurring between 1642 and 1651) led in several ways to the system of government that the United Kingdom (or, England) has today. The most important result of the Civil War was the formal limitation of monarchical power in England: no longer would English kings rule absolutely; henceforth, their rule would be counter-balanced (and otherwise limited) by the English Parliament.
He was a government worker, a civil servant. Specifically, he was a Customs Official, collecting import duties at the border. This was a secure job but not very well paid. His economic status would have been lower middle class-middle class. He was also apparently a domineering drunkard.
Im not exactly sure but I would say England.
The Petition of Right
The short term causes is something i do not know and is exactly what i am looking for however i know what the long term causes are. Religion, Politics, Economy. Short term causes may have something to do with how Charles used his money; on his own clothes, favourites and his family rather than on his country
The world would be worse because we would not have good music to listen to
because if he hadnt had sex with a roach we would be dead
China would have flooded
Neither- Colorado did not become a state until 1 August 1876, eleven years after Civil War's end.
In the 17th century, the English Civil War (a set of three distinct conflicts occurring between 1642 and 1651) led in several ways to the system of government that the United Kingdom (or, England) has today. The most important result of the Civil War was the formal limitation of monarchical power in England: no longer would English kings rule absolutely; henceforth, their rule would be counter-balanced (and otherwise limited) by the English Parliament.
Slaves would fight for England. Not sure that I see the relevance, please explain. Was England significantly involved in the American Civil War, which, I assume, is what we are discussing?
that is a very vast question... civil suits very state to state. the most common civil suits I would have to say involves car accidents or small businesses
Yes definetely if he hadnt figured out what he did everthing about science would be different!!
I suspect that would be Vermont.
difficult to answer, who knows what the Germans would have done. the battle of Britain in may 1940 over kent south east England, was a particularly viscous dogfight in which the RAF were literally fighting for their and Britain's lives. if the RAF hadnt destroyed the luftwaffe, then Germany without doubt would have had an easier time of invading England. this defeat totally demoralised the Germans and they realised that the RAF ruled the skies.
Darwin wouldn't of found the guanaco or the opossum if he hadnt travelled on the voyage.
Henry Clay