answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations (1776), made an argument on the economic advantages that organizations and society would achieve from the division of labor, which is the breakdown of jobs into narrow, repetitive tasks. Smith concluded that division of labor increased productivity by increasing each worker's skill and dexterity, by saving time that is usually lost in changing tasks, and by the creation of labor- saving inventions and machinery. Probably, the most important influence on management was the Industrial Revolution. It began in the late eighteenth century in Great Britain, where machine power was being substituted for human power. Thanks to this movement, there was the development of big organizations. John D. Rockefeller was putting together the Standard Oil monopoly, Andrew Carnegie was gaining control of two- thirds of the steel industry, and other people were creating new businesses that would require formalized management practices. CLASSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS The roots of modern management lie within a group of practitioners and writers who gave their contributions to management which we call the classical approach. The classical approach is the term used to describe the scientific management theorists and the general administrative theorists. We can divide it into two subcategories:

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was Adam Smith contribution to the field of management?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Management

Who are the People contribute in field of management?

There have been several people throughout history that have made significant contributions to the field of management and public relations. Some of these are Adam Smith, James Watt, Matthew Boulton, Robert Owens, Charles Babbage, Andrew Ure, Charles Dupin, Henry Town, Frederick Halsey, Henry Metcalfe, Daniel McCallum, Fredrick Taylor and Henry Gantt.


What is the history of production management?

1. Adam Smith The first person who attempted production improvement, was Adam Smith in 1776. During this stage, Operation 1. It involves rendering of kind of services, such as electricity, cooking gas etc. 2. It is used in a broad sense. 3. It is applied to non-manufacturing organizations, such as Banks, Insurance, agriculture, transportation, warehousing, etc. 4. There is nothing like closing stock. 5. Demand for services fluctuate time to time. Production 1. It involves manufacturing of a tangible product 2. It is used in a narrow sense 3. It is applied to manufacturing organisations, such as industry 4. It will have closing stock at the end of an accounting year 5. Demand for the product is regular factory system was in its infancy. His main contribution to production management was the extension of the principle of division of labour to industrial activities. The application of division of labour results in three benefits, which are as follows: (i) Improvement of skill owing to repeated operations. (ii) Savings in time as it does not need change from one activity to another. (iii) Specialisation leads to invention in machines and methods. The above advantages of division of labour result in increased output. 2. Charles Babbage In the year 1832, the British Mathematician Charles Babbage published his book entitled. "The Economics of Machinery and Manufactures". His main contribution to production management are as follows: (a) Division of labour: In his masterpiece work on "The Economy of Machinery and Manufacture," Babbage explained the benefits arising out of specialization, (b) Use of science and mathematics: He advocated the practice of scientific method of production instead of the traditional manufacturing process, and (c) Emphasis on cost reduction: He suggested that every effort must be made to reduce cost by adopting new and improved methods of production. 3. James Watt and Mathew Robinson Boulton James Watt, the junior and Mathew R. Boulton were the sons of the inventors of steam engine. Their contribution to production management are as follows: (a) Planned machine layout in factories. (b) Production planning. (c) Use of records to calculate cost of production and profit. (d) Training and development programme for workers. (e) Work study and payment by output. 4. F. W. Taylor F. W. Taylor's major publications are: "A Piece Rate System (1895), Shop Management (1903) and The Principles of Scientific Management." His major contribution to production management are as follows: (a) A clearly defined daily task: Each man in the establishment, high or low, should daily have a clearly defined task laid out before him. (b) Standard conditions: The workers should be given such standardised conditions and appliances as will enable him to accomplish his task with certainty. (c) Higher pay for success: The worker should be sure of higher pay when he accomplishes his task. The emphasis is on the importance of "the coupling of high wages for workmen with low labour cost for the employer" and as a result, the public will benefit from lower prices. (d) Loss in the case of failure: When, a workman fails, he should be sure that sooner or later he will be the loser for it. 5. Subsequent developments After the World War II the theory and technique of production management began to improve. Many researches were conducted the latest development being linear programme. This technique helped in solving allocation of limited resources. Introduction of computers and internet further helped in automation. The process of information dissemination. 6. Present Position Since Adam Smith, we have progressed in every field of production. Production and productive capacity have increased and design, equipment and house building technologies have developed. We have improved industrial relations and quality of our products and services.


Who is royal mail CEO?

Adam Crozier is Royal Mail CEO


Why is management important to your organization?

Management in all business and organizational activities is the act of getting people together to accomplish desired goals and objectives using available resources efficiently and effectively. Management comprises planning, organizing, staffing, leading or directing, and controlling an organization (a group of one or more people or entities) or effort for the purpose of accomplishing a goal. Resourcing encompasses the deployment and manipulation of human resources, financial resources, technological resources and Natural Resources.Since organizations can be viewed as systems, management can also be defined as human action, including design, to facilitate the production of useful outcomes from a system. This view opens the opportunity to 'manage' oneself, a pre-requisite to attempting to manage others.Contents[hide] 1 History 1.1 Theoretical scope2 Nature of managerial work3 Historical development 3.1 Early writing 3.1.1 Sun Tzu's The Art of War3.1.2 Chanakya's Arthashastra3.1.3 Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince3.1.4 Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations3.2 19th century3.3 20th century3.4 21st century4 Topics 4.1 Basic functions4.2 Basic roles4.3 Management skills4.4 Formation of the business policy 4.4.1 Implementation of policies and strategies4.4.2 Policies and strategies in the planning process4.5 Levels of management 4.5.1 Top-level managers4.5.2 Middle-level managers4.5.3 First-level managers5 See also6 References7 External linksHistoryThe verb manage comes from the Italian maneggiare (to handle - especially tools), which in turn derives from the Latin manus (hand). The French word mesnagement (later ménagement) influenced the development in meaning of the English word management in the 17th and 18th centuries.[1] Some definitions of management are:Organization and coordination of the activities of an enterprise in accordance with certain policies and in achievement of clearly defined objectives. Management is often included as a factor of production along with machines, materials and money. According to the management guru Peter Drucker (1909-2005), the basic task of a management is twofold: marketing and innovation.Directors and managers have the power and responsibility to make decisions to manage an enterprise when given the authority by the shareholders. As a discipline, management comprises the interlocking functions of formulating corporate policy and organizing, planning, controlling, and directing the firm's resources to achieve the policy's objectives. The size of management can range from one person in a small firm to hundreds or thousands of managers in multinational companies. In large firms the board of directors formulates the policy which is implemented by the chief executive officer.Theoretical scopeAt first, one views management functionally, such as measuring quantity, adjusting plans, meeting goals. This applies even in situations planning does not take place. From this perspective, Henri Fayol (1841-1925)[2] considers management to consist of six functions: forecasting, planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. He was one of the most influential contributors to modern concepts of management. Another way of thinking, Mary Parker Follett (1868-1933), defined management as "the art of getting things done through people". She described management as philosophy.[3]Some people, however, find this definition useful but far too narrow. The phrase "management is what managers do" occurs widely, suggesting the difficulty of defining management, the shifting nature of definitions and the connection of managerial practices with the existence of a managerial cadre or class.One habit of thought regards management as equivalent to "business administration" and thus excludes management in places outside commerce, as for example in charities and in the public sector. More realistically, however, every organization must manage its work, people, processes, technology, etc. to maximize effectiveness. Nonetheless, many people refer to university departments which teach management as "business schools." Some institutions (such as the Harvard Business School) use that name while others (such as the Yale School of Management) employ the more inclusive term "management."English speakers may also use the term "management" or "the management" as a collective word describing the managers of an organization, for example of a corporation. Historically this use of the term was often contrasted with the term "Labor" referring to those being managed.Nature of managerial workIn for-profit work, management has as its primary function the satisfaction of a range of stakeholders. This typically involves making a profit (for the shareholders), creating valued products at a reasonable cost (for customers) and providing rewarding employment opportunities (for employees). In nonprofit management, add the importance of keeping the faith of donors. In most models of management/governance, shareholders vote for the board of directors, and the board then hires senior management. Some organizations have experimented with other methods (such as employee-voting models) of selecting or reviewing managers; but this occurs only very rarely. In the public sector of countries constituted as representative democracies, voters elect politicians to public office. Such politicians hire many managers and administrators, and in some countries like the United States political appointees lose their jobs on the election of a new president/governor/mayor.Historical developmentDifficulties arise in tracing the history of management. Some see it (by definition) as a late modern (in the sense of late modernity) conceptualization. On those terms it cannot have a pre-modern history, only harbingers (such as stewards). Others, however, detect management-like-thought back to Sumerian traders and to the builders of the pyramids of ancient Egypt. Slave-owners through the centuries faced the problems of exploiting/motivating a dependent but sometimes unenthusiastic or recalcitrant workforce, but many pre-industrial enterprises, given their small scale, did not feel compelled to face the issues of management systematically. However, innovations such as the spread of Arabic numerals (5th to 15th centuries) and the codification of double-entry book-keeping (1494) provided tools for management assessment, planning and control. Given the scale of most commercial operations and the lack of mechanized record-keeping and recording before the industrial revolution, it made sense for most owners of enterprises in those times to carry out management functions by and for themselves. But with growing size and complexity of organizations, the split between owners (individuals, industrial dynasties or groups of shareholders) and day-to-day managers (independent specialists in planning and control) gradually became more common.Early writingWhile management has been present for millennia, several writers have created a background of works that assisted in modern management theories.[4] Sun Tzu's The Art of WarWritten by Chinese general Sun Tzu in the 6th century BC, The Art of War is a military strategy book that, for managerial purposes, recommends being aware of and acting on strengths and weaknesses of both a manager's organization and a foe's.[4]Chanakya's ArthashastraChanakya wrote the Arthashastra around 300BC in which various strategies, techniques and management theories were written which gives an account on the management of empires, economy and family. The work is often compared to the later works of Machiavelli[citation needed].Niccolò Machiavelli's The PrinceBelieving that people were motivated by self-interest, Niccolò Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 as advice for the city of Florence, Italy.[5] Machiavelli recommended that leaders use fear-but not hatred-to maintain control[citation needed].Adam Smith's The Wealth of NationsWritten in 1776 by Adam Smith, a Scottish moral philosopher, The Wealth of Nations aims for efficient organization of work through Specialization of labor.[5] Smith described how changes in processes could boost productivity in the manufacture of pins. While individuals could produce 200 pins per day, Smith analyzed the steps involved in manufacture and, with 10 specialists, enabled production of 48,000 pins per day.[5]19th centuryClassical economists such as Adam Smith (1723-1790) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) provided a theoretical background to resource-allocation, production, and pricing issues. About the same time, innovators like Eli Whitney (1765-1825), James Watt (1736-1819), and Matthew Boulton (1728-1809) developed elements of technical production such as standardization, quality-control procedures, cost-accounting, interchangeability of parts, and work-planning. Many of these aspects of management existed in the pre-1861 slave-based sector of the US economy. That environment saw 4 million people, as the contemporary usages had it, "managed" in profitable quasi-mass production. 20th centuryBy about 1900 one finds managers trying to place their theories on what they regarded as a thoroughly scientific basis (see scientism for perceived limitations of this belief). Examples include Henry R. Towne's Science of management in the 1890s, Frederick Winslow Taylor's The Principles of Scientific Management(1911), Frank and Lillian Gilbreth's Applied motion study(1917), and Henry L. Gantt's charts (1910s). J. Duncan wrote the first college management textbook in 1911. In 1912 Yoichi Ueno introduced Taylorism to Japan and became first management consultant of the "Japanese-management style". His son Ichiro Ueno pioneered Japanese quality assurance. The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Church described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early 20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Scott and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management, while other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Parker Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (1923 - ) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociological perspective.Peter Drucker (1909-2005) wrote one of the earliest books on applied management: Concept of the Corporation (published in 1946). It resulted from Alfred Sloan (chairman of General Motors until 1956) commissioning a study of the organisation. Drucker went on to write 39 books, many in the same vein.H. Dodge, Ronald Fisher (1890-1962), and Thornton C. Fry introduced statistical techniques into management-studies. In the 1940s, Patrick Blackett combined these statistical theories with microeconomic theory and gave birth to the science of operations research. Operations research, sometimes known as "management science" (but distinct from Taylor's scientific management), attempts to take a scientific approach to solving management problems, particularly in the areas of logistics and operations.Some of the more recent[update] developments include the Theory of Constraints, management by objectives, reengineering, Six Sigma and various information-technology-driven theories such as agile software development, as well as group management theories such as Cog's Ladder.As the general recognition of managers as a class solidified during the 20th century and gave perceived practitioners of the art/science of management a certain amount of prestige, so the way opened for popularised systems of management ideas to peddle their wares. In this context many management fads may have had more to do with pop psychology than with scientific theories of management.Towards the end of the 20th century, business management came to consist of six separate branches, namely:Human resource managementOperations management or production managementStrategic managementMarketing managementFinancial managementInformation technology management responsible for management information systems21st centuryIn the 21st century observers find it increasingly difficult to subdivide management into functional categories in this way. More and more processes simultaneously involve several categories. Instead, one tends to think in terms of the various processes, tasks, and objects subject to management. Branches of management theory also exist relating to nonprofits and to government: such as public administration, public management, and educational management. Further, management programs related to civil-society organizations have also spawned programs in nonprofit management and social entrepreneurship.Note that many of the assumptions made by management have come under attack from business ethics viewpoints, critical management studies, and anti-corporate activism.As one consequence, workplace democracy has become both more common, and more advocated, in some places distributing all management functions among the workers, each of whom takes on a portion of the work. However, these models predate any current political issue, and may occur more naturally than does a command hierarchy. All management to some degree embraces democratic principles in that in the long term workers must give majority support to management; otherwise they leave to find other work, or go on strike. Despite the move toward workplace democracy, command-and-control organization structures remain commonplace and the de facto organization structure. Indeed, the entrenched nature of command-and-control can be seen in the way that recent layoffs have been conducted with management ranks affected far less than employees at the lower levels. In some cases, management has even rewarded itself with bonuses after laying off level workers.[6]According to leading leadership academic Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries, it's almost inevitable these days that there will be some personality disorders in a senior management team.[7]TopicsBasic functionsManagement operates through various functions, often classified as planning, organizing, staffing, leading/directing, controlling/monitoring and motivation. Planning: Deciding what needs to happen in the future (today, next week, next month, next year, over the next five years, etc.) and generating plans for action.Organizing: (Implementation)pattern of relationships among workers, making optimum use of the resources required to enable the successful carrying out of plans.Staffing: Job analysis, recruitment and hiring for appropriate jobs.Leading/directing: Determining what needs to be done in a situation and getting people to do it.Controlling/monitoring: Checking progress against plans.Motivation: Motivation is also a kind of basic function of management, because without motivation, employees cannot work effectively. If motivation does not take place in an organization, then employees may not contribute to the other functions (which are usually set by top-level management).Basic rolesInterpersonal: roles that involve coordination and interaction with employees.Informational: roles that involve handling, sharing, and analyzing information.Decisional: roles that require decision-making.Management skillsPolitical: used to build a power base and establish connections.Conceptual: used to analyze complex situations.Interpersonal: used to communicate, motivate, mentor and delegate.Diagnostic: ability to visualize most appropriate response to a situation.Technical: Expertise in one's particular functional area.[8]Formation of the business policyThe mission of the business is the most obvious purpose-which may be, for example, to make soap.The vision of the business reflects its aspirations and specifies its intended direction or future destination.The objectives of the business refers to the ends or activity at which a certain task is aimed.The business's policy is a guide that stipulates rules, regulations and objectives, and may be used in the managers' decision-making. It must be flexible and easily interpreted and understood by all employees.The business's strategy refers to the coordinated plan of action that it is going to take, as well as the resources that it will use, to realize its vision and long-term objectives. It is a guideline to managers, stipulating how they ought to allocate and utilize the factors of production to the business's advantage. Initially, it could help the managers decide on what type of business they want to form.Implementation of policies and strategiesAll policies and strategies must be discussed with all managerial personnel and staff.Managers must understand where and how they can implement their policies and strategies.A plan of action must be devised for each department.Policies and strategies must be reviewed regularly.Contingency plans must be devised in case the environment changes.Assessments of progress ought to be carried out regularly by top-level managers.A good environment and team spirit is required within the business.The missions, objectives, strengths and weaknesses of each department must be analysed to determine their roles in achieving the business's mission.The forecasting method develops a reliable picture of the business's future environment.A planning unit must be created to ensure that all plans are consistent and that policies and strategies are aimed at achieving the same mission and objectives.All policies must be discussed with all managerial personnel and staff that is required in the execution of any departmental policy.Organizational change is strategically achieved through the implementation of the eight-step plan of action established by John P. Kotter: Increase urgency, get the vision right, communicate the buy-in, empower action, create short-term wins, don't let up, and make change stick.[9]Policies and strategies in the planning processThey give mid and lower-level managers a good idea of the future plans for each department in an organization.A framework is created whereby plans and decisions are made.Mid and lower-level management may add their own plans to the business's strategies.Levels of managementMost organizations have three management levels: first-level, middle-level, and top-level managers.[citation needed] These managers are classified in a hierarchy of authority, and perform different tasks. In many organizations, the number of managers in every level resembles a pyramid. Each level is explained below in specifications of their different responsibilities and likely job titles.[10] Top-level managersConsists of board of directors, president, vice-president, CEOs, etc. They are responsible for controlling and overseeing the entire organization. They develop goals, strategic plans, company policies, and make decisions on the direction of the business. In addition, top-level managers play a significant role in the mobilization of outside resources and are accountable to the shareholders and general public.According to Lawrence S. Kleiman, the following skills are needed at the top managerial level. [11]Broadened understanding of how: competition, world economies, politics, and social trends effect organizational effectiveness .The role of the top management can be summarized as follows -Top management lays down the objectives and broad policies of the enterprise.It issues necessary instructions for preparation of department budgets, procedures, schedules etc.It prepares strategic plans & policies for the enterprise.It appoints the executive for middle level i.e. departmental managers.It controls & coordinates the activities of all the departments.It is also responsible for maintaining a contact with the outside world.It provides guidance and direction.The top management is also responsible towards the shareholders for the performance of the enterprise.Middle-level managersConsist of general managers, branch managers and department managers. They are accountable to the top management for their department's function. They devote more time to organizational and directional functions. Their roles can be emphasized as executing organizational plans in conformance with the company's policies and the objectives of the top management, they define and discuss information and policies from top management to lower management, and most importantly they inspire and provide guidance to lower level managers towards better performance. Some of their functions are as follows:Designing and implementing effective group and intergroup work and information systems.Defining and monitoring group-level performance indicators.Diagnosing and resolving problems within and among work groups.Designing and implementing reward systems supporting cooperative behavior.First-level managersConsist of supervisors, section leads, foremen, etc. They focus on controlling and directing. They usually have the responsibility of assigning employees tasks, guiding and supervising employees on day-to-day activities, ensuring quality and quantity production, making recommendations, suggestions, and upchanneling employee problems, etc. First-level managers are role models for employees that provide:Basic supervision.Motivation.Career planning.Performance feedback.See alsoMain article: Outline of business management Scientific managementHuman relations movementStrategic managementTotal quality managementReferences^ Oxford English Dictionary^ Administration industrielle et générale - prévoyance organization - commandment, coordination - contrôle, Paris : Dunod, 1966^ Vocational Business: Training, Developing and Motivating People by Richard Barrett - Business & Economics - 2003. - Page 51.^ a b Gomez-Mejia, Luis R.; David B. Balkin and Robert L. Cardy (2008). Management: People, Performance, Change, 3rd edition. New York, New York USA: McGraw-Hill. pp. 19. ISBN 978-0-07-302743-2.^ a b c Gomez-Mejia, Luis R.; David B. Balkin and Robert L. Cardy (2008). Management: People, Performance, Change, 3rd edition. New York, New York USA: McGraw-Hill. pp. 20. ISBN 978-0-07-302743-2.^ Craig, S. (2009, January 29). Merrill Bonus Case Widens as Deal Struggles. Wall Street Journal. [1]^ Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries The Dark Side of Leadership - Business Strategy Review 14(3), Autumn Page 26 (2003).^ Kleiman, Lawrence S. "Management and Executive Development." Reference for Business: Encyclopedia of Business (2010): n. pag. Web. 25 Mar 2011. [2].^ Kotter, John P. & Dan S. Cohen. (2002). The Heart of Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.^ Juneja hu Juneja, FirstHimanshu, and Prachi Juneja. "Management." Management Study Guide. WebCraft Pvt Ltd, 2011. Web. 17 Mar 2011.[3].^ Kleiman, Lawrence S. " MANAGEMENT AND EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT."Reference for Business:Encyclopedia of Business(2010): n. pag. Web. 25 Mar 2011. [4].External linksWikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Management[show] vteManagementOutline of business managementIndex of management articlesManagerManagement branches FinanceHuman resourcesInformation technologyMarketingOperations/productionStrategyOther Management areasAccountingAssociationCapabilityChangeCommunicationConflictConstructionCostCrisisCriticalCustomer relationshipDistributedEarned valueEducationalEngineeringEnvironmentalFacilityHospitalInformationInnovationInterimInventoryKnowledgeLandLogisticsLifecycleMarine fuelMaterialsOfficePerceptionPracticeProgramProjectProcessPerformanceProductPublic administrationQualityRecordsResourceRestaurantRiskSkillsStrategicStressSupply chainSystemsTalentTimeTechnologyManagement-related topicsAssociation of Technology, Management, and Applied EngineeringApplied engineeringBusiness schoolChartered Management InstituteDecision making stylesOrganization developmentOrganizational studiesSocial entrepreneurshipForecastingLeadershipArticlesAdhocracyAdministrationCertified Business ManagerCollaborationCollaborative methodCorporate governanceDecision MakingEngineering managementEvidence-based managementExecutive PayForecastingFutures studiesGrowthKnowledge visualizationLeadershipManagement consultingManagement controlManagement cyberneticsManagement developmentManagement fadManagerial PsychologyManagement scienceManagement stylesManagement systemManagerialismMicromanagementMacromanagementMiddle managementMusic managementOrganizational behavior managementOrganizational studiesPredictive analyticsTeam buildingScientific managementSenior managementSocial entrepreneurshipVirtual managementWilliamson's Model of Managerial DiscretionPeter Drucker's management by objectivesEliyahu M. Goldratt's Theory of constraintsPointy Haired Boss[show]vteSocial SciencesAnthropologyArchaeologyEconomicsGeography: Human geographyHistoryLawLinguisticsPolitical science: International studies, Political economy, Public administrationPsychologySociology: Criminology, Criminal justice, DemographyInterdisciplinary areas: Anthrozoology, Area studies, Communication studies, Cultural studies, Development studies,Environmental studies, Gender studies, Global studies, International studies, Media studiesIn Italics: Discipline subbranches and interdisciplinary areasAlternative categorizationsHumanitiesGeisteswissenschaftHuman scienceIndexJournalsOutlinePortalWikiProjectWikiversityView page ratings Rate this pageRate this pagePage ratingsWhat's this?Current average ratings.TrustworthyObjectiveCompleteWell-writtenI am highly knowledgeable about this topic (optional)I have a relevant college/university degreeIt is part of my professionIt is a deep personal passionThe source of my knowledge is not listed hereI would like to help improve Wikipedia, send me an e-mail (optional)We will send you a confirmation e-mail. We will not share your e-mail address with outside parties as per our feedback privacy statement.Submit ratingsSaved successfullyYour ratings have not been submitted yetYour ratings have expiredPlease reevaluate this page and submit new ratings.An error has occurred. Please try again later.Thanks! Your ratings have been saved.Do you want to create an account?An account will help you track your edits, get involved in discussions, and be a part of the community.Create an accountorLog inMaybe laterThanks! Your ratings have been saved.Did you know that you can edit this page?Edit this pageMaybe laterPersonal toolsCreate accountLog inNamespacesArticleTalkVariantsViewsReadEditView historyActionsSearchNavigationMain pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikimedia ShopInteractionHelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact WikipediaToolboxWhat links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageRate this pagePrint/exportCreate a bookDownload as PDFPrintable versionLanguagesالعربيةঅসমীয়াAzərbaycancaবাংলাБеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎BoarischBosanskiBrezhonegБългарскиCatalàČeskyDanskDeutschEestiΕλληνικάEspañolEuskaraفارسیFrançaisFrysk한국어Հայերենहिन्दीHrvatskiBahasa IndonesiaItalianoעבריתქართულიҚазақшаКыргызчаKiswahiliລາວLatviešuLietuviųMagyarМакедонскиമലയാളംМонголNederlands日本語Norsk (bokmål)‎پښتوPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийShqipSicilianuසිංහලSlovenčinaSlovenščinaСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиSvenskaTagalogதமிழ்ไทยTürkçeУкраїнськаTiếng ViệtייִדישŽemaitėška中文This page was last modified on 16 November 2012 at 06:48.Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.Contact usPrivacy policyAbout WikipediaDisclaimersMobile view


Why are humans referred to as resources and what is the difference between humans and resources?

A. Why Humans ( People ) are Called Resources? Prior to humans being called resources, they were either called slaves, servants, labourers, workers, employees, staff, personnel etc depending on their "ownership" or relationship with the other party desirous of their economic contribution and the socio-politico order of the day. With the industrial revolution and the rise of economics theory and thinkers, Adam Smith's production formula of Land, Labour and Capital became popular. The mobilisation of large numbers of people became the job of establishment departments or labour departments, later known as personnel (NOT personal) departments, and now HR Departments. In the academic world, the study of humans took a scientific approach, and social studies became accepted as social sciences, and the study of human behaviour, in groups and as individuals, became known as behaviourial sciences. "Industrial psychologists" also manage to find berths in Personnel Departments and HR Departments of large corporations and multi-nationals. Scientific management led to the question of "what is there to manage?", and the answer was (and still is?) as follows; 1. cost 2. time 3. resources Resources can be broken down as follows; 1. financial 2. human 3. materials / equipment / technology (knowledge) Thus giving rise to the phrase human resources! B. What is the Difference Between Human and Resources? 21st century thinking is beginning to give more credit to humans, viewing them (us!) as more than a production unit that is capable of innovation and creativity, essential ingredients in the knowledge economy. The fall of communism and the dominance of capitalism and rising consumerism, plus globalisation and centralisation (polarisation?) of production capacities to achieve massive economies of scale, and competition to secure energy sources, has only shifted our views of humans slightly ie from pure (human) resources to humans as a source of knowledge. Hence the "what's to manage" thingy looks like following; 1. cost 2. time 3. resources with resources categorised as follows; 1. financial (capital) 2. human knowledge (capital) 3. materials / technology / energy thus the present buzz words "human capital" as a key competitive edge / leverage in a global and knowledge-driven world economy. Industrial psychologists and social engineers are kept busy at finding ways of "humaneering" the corporate culture and the work place (family place?). So people, Got it? If not, see your Chief Learning Officer!

Related questions

What was adam smith contribution to field of management?

Practical implications: Smith's contributions provide a foundation for the division.


What major contributions did Adam Smith contribute to the field of economics regarding micro economics and macro economics?

the contribution of macroeconomics to microeconomics


How did the following individuals define management 1charles Babbage 2 Adam smith 3 Jacques turgot 4 Adam smith 5 john baptise?

you have not answered


Economic philosophers and their contribution to the field of economics?

Adam Smith was an economic philosopher who contributed to the field of economics by outlining his theory in the book, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations." David Hume was another economic philosopher who contributed to the field of economics by contributing to the understanding of economic anthropology.


Who was the economist was the main promoted the use of demand management techniques to control the economy?

Adam Smith


Who is referred to as the father of economics?

John Maynard Keynes


Who is Adam Rosenzweig?

Adam R. Rosenzweig is a financial advisor in the Global Wealth Management unit of Smith Barney, a subsidiary of Citi Global Markets.


Father of economist?

Adam Smith is considered as the father of the economy. He is known as the most influential thinker in the field of economics. In 1759, he published his first book entitled The Theory of Moral Sentiments.


What has the author Lilian Adam Smith written?

Lilian Adam Smith has written: 'George Adam Smith'


Adam Smith what is he most known for?

Adam smith...........


How tall is Adam C Smith?

Adam C Smith is 5' 9".


The free-market system of capitalism was defended in the book The Wealth of Nations by whom?

Adam Smith wrote the book called the wealth of nations