answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The precedent followed prior to Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) was established in Betts v. Brady,316 US 455 (1942), which held the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause didn't require states to provide court-appointed counsel to indigent defendants except in death penalty cases. The Supreme Court reversed this decision in Gideon because access to counsel was necessary to protect a defendant's fundamental constitutional rights.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The US Supreme Court set a precedent requiring states to provide court-appointed counsel to indigent criminal defendants by applying the Sixth Amendment to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause.

Explanation

The US Supreme Court overturned the earlier decision in Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455 (1942), which held states weren't required to provide court-appointed counsel at trial, and failure to do so didn't violate a defendant's Due Process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

In Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) the Supreme Court unanimously held that states had to provide free legal counsel to indigent criminal defendants. The Court asserted that poor people were being deprived of their Sixth Amendment constitutional right to an attorney, which applied to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. The condition of poverty placed defendants in a position of not receiving the same opportunity for a fair trial (due process) as people who could afford to hire an attorney, which was unconstitutional.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was precedent before Gideon v. Wainwright?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who has to follow the precedent in Gideon v Wainwright?

The states have to follow the precedent set in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963). The US Supreme Court used the fourteenth Amendment due process clause to incorporate the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states. This reversed their earlier decision in Betts v Brady.


What is the citation for Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)The case was originally called Gideon v. Cochran, but Louie L. Wainwright succeeded Cochran as Secretary to the Florida Department of Corrections before the case was heard in the US Supreme Court.


Who is Gideon V Wainwright?

He is a correction director


Which decision by the warren court determined that state must provide a lawyer to a person accused of a crime who cannot afford one?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)


What was a social impact of the gideon v wainwright case?

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that if a defendant cannot afford a lawyer, one must be provided to him or her regardless of the defendant's ability to pay or the importance of the charges.


What decision by warren court determined that the state must provide a lawyer to a person accused of a crime who cannot afford one?

Gideon v. Wainwright


What was the reasoning behind the gideon v. wainwright decisio?

Florida


Who wrote the majority opinion in Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Which court case states that everyone is entitled to an attorney if they cannot afford?

Gideon V. Wainwright (A+, Civics)


What group benefited from Gideon v Wainwright?

The Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) ensured indigent criminal defendants had access to a court-appoint attorney.


Who where the parties involved in the Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Clarence Earl Gideon, a habitual petty criminal, was the petitioner/plaintiff; Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary to the Florida Department of Corrections, was the respondent/defendant. Wainwright's predecessor, H. G. Cochran, Jr., was the original respondent, but vacated office before the case reached the US Supreme Court.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Was Gideon v wainwright a civil rights or civil liberties case?

both