answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Their attitude was that they were trying to express their relationship with God to the fullest. That's why they requested to hear God Himself speaking at Mount Sinai, not just Moses (Rashi commentary on Exodus 19:9). That's also why they accepted the Torah with its hundreds of commands and restrictions, many of which they had not been accustomed to during the centuries in Egypt.

This is the traditional interpretation of the parable of the two lovers in the Song of Songs: the two lovers represent God and the Israelites. The Israelites were in love with God (Jeremiah 2:2).

When approaching the topic of the complaints which the Israelites made in the wilderness (Exodus ch.15,16,17 and 32; Numbers ch.11,13,16,20 and 21), we should bear in mind the following:

1) The Israelites were intelligent and possessed strong opinions.

2) They were people of initiative.

3) They weren't perfect.

4) The prophetic books spotlight and magnify their faults because the people were being held to a superlative standard (Rabbi Yehudah HaLevi).

5) God punished them in this world, to leave them unblemished in the next world.

So here are some examples:

a) When they mentioned the lack of meat (Exodus ch.16) despite the fact that they actually did have kosher livestock (Numbers 32:1), certainly part of the reason may have been stubbornness (Exodus 32:9). But the voice of prophecy (in Psalms 78:20) reveals another reason: they wanted God to demonstrate His power and provide meat miraculously (which He soon did). They loved seeing the power of God.

b) When they mentioned the lack of water (Exodus ch.15), they had by that time journeyed for three days in the arid wilderness without finding any water (ibid). This is a case in which God was holding them to superhuman standards; and they complained not a single word until the third thirsty day. They understood that it was a test and were willing to suffer.

c) The episode of the spies (Numbers ch.13) was a case of people of strong opinions. This is the meaning of the word anashimas it is used in Numbers 13:3. The spies were men of leadership. They formed an opinion and stuck to it. Their opinion was that it was as yet too soon to attempt conquering the Holy Land, because of the losses which could occur in war. Better to wait until the nation would increase (see Exodus 23:30). The problem was that this attitude could be seen as a lack of trust in God (Deuteronomy 1:32).

d) The Golden Calf (Exodus ch.32) was a case of taking the initiative.

It was a one-time error which was quickly and decisively stamped out. And while it was a serious offense, it may be a bit less of a puzzle if we consider the following:

1) It seemed that Moses had died (Rashi commentary, Exodus 32:1); and they wanted something or someone to lead them (Exodus 32:1). They felt that this (seemingly) drastic circumstance justified quickly taking unusual measures.

2) They had a tradition that they would eventually build an edifice to God (Rashi, Exodus 26:15); and, not yet having been commanded as to the details (the Tabernacle), they thought that they might now improvise.

3) The actual intent was not to worship the Golden Calf itself, but to worship the Presence of God (Exodus 32:5) which (they hoped) would dwell upon it.

4) The entire event was instigated by Egyptians (Rashi, Exodus 32:4) who had recently joined among the mixed multitude (Exodus 12:38).

5) Those who sinned were, at most, in the thousands (Exodus 32:28). Not hundreds of thousands.

6) That generation was judged by an exacting standard, precisely because they were on a high level (Rabbi Yehudah HaLevi).

7) In each era, there are different spiritual tests. The (main) test in ancient times was whether people would succumb to the lure of idolatry and its preludes. This powerful lure has since been emasculated (Talmud, Yoma 69b), so it is hard for us now to fully comprehend.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The Israelites in the generations of the Prophets were on a much higher spiritual level than we are today. They lived with the Afterlife as part of the larger picture. They firsthand knowledge of God's existence (not just belief), and they wanted Him to demonstrate his power. However, they were at times punished for overstepping on this matter.

See also the Related Links.

Link: About the Hebrew Bible

Link: Jewish history timeline

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the attitude of the Israelites towards God while they were in the wilderness?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Did the Israelites build the Tabernacle before they went into the wilderness or while they were in the wilderness?

3-months after leaving Egypt, Moses and the Israelis came to Mount Sinai. Moses received the "Ten Commandants" and the plans for the earthly tabernacle. They were in the wilderness.


How does perspective shape ones attitude?

Perspective influences how we interpret and react to situations. A positive perspective can lead to a more optimistic attitude, while a negative perspective can result in a more pessimistic attitude. By changing our perspective, we can shift our attitude towards a situation.


What did the israelites do while moses was on the mount?

The events of the Golden Calf transpired:http://judaism.answers.com/kosher/the-complaints-in-the-wilderness-and-the-golden-calf


An author takes toward the subject the audience or the character?

An author's tone is the attitude they convey towards the subject matter, audience, or characters in their writing. This can influence how the reader perceives the text and the emotions evoked while reading.


What is the difference between Opinion and attitude?

An opinion is your point of view; how you see things. While an attitude is how you act upon a situation. These two are related in a sense that your attitude can depend on your opinions. For example, if you think that doing this certain something is a waste of your time( opinion), then you might act irritable or annoyed (attitude towards something.) - hope this helps:))


What is Harper Lee's attitude towards the south?

Harper Lee's attitude towards the South can be seen as complex and multifaceted. In "To Kill a Mockingbird," she presents a nostalgic view of a small southern town but also addresses issues of racism and social injustice. Overall, her writing reflects a love for the South while not shying away from its complexities and shortcomings.


What type of bird did God provide for the Israelites in the wilderness?

The Israelites were mad at God and Moses because they didn't want to eat manna anymore (because they were complaining people) so God gave them quail.Jewish answer:Quail.The Israelites weren't "mad" at God. The first to speak up were the newly-arrived converts (Numbers ch.11), not the Israelites. Rather than "madness" at God, they wanted God to demonstrate His presence (Exodus 17:7) by providing for them, just as God wanted them to demonstrate their obedience when He tested them by giving them an unfamiliar food (Deuteronomy 8:2-5; see Exodus ch.16).


What is difference between opinion and attitude?

An opinion is your point of view; how you see things. While an attitude is how you act upon a situation. These two are related in a sense that your attitude can depend on your opinions. For example, if you think that doing this certain something is a waste of your time( opinion), then you might act irritable or annoyed (attitude towards something.)Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/What_is_the_difference_between_attitude_and_opinion#ixzz1K6Mzt9c5


What was Mr. Ewells attitude while he was testifying?

His attitude was cocky and arrogant.


How was Nick's attitude towards Gatsby ambivalent even at the moment when he says goodbye to him?

Nick's attitude towards Gatsby was ambivalent because while he admired Gatsby's determination and dream, he also disapproved of the way he attained wealth and pursued Daisy. Nick saw Gatsby as exceptionally hopeful yet tragically flawed. Despite this conflict, Nick felt a sense of loyalty and empathy towards Gatsby, leading to his ambivalence.


Which bird fed the israelites while they were in the desert?

It was the quail.


What attitudes towards children does it reflect Note how it balances against the?

It reflects a positive attitude towards children by emphasizing the importance of both showing them love and setting boundaries for discipline. The balance between love and discipline acknowledges the need to nurture children emotionally while also guiding them towards responsible behavior.