answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The US Supreme Court held The Espionage Act of 1917 (ch. 30, tit. I § 3, 40 Stat. 217, 219) was constitutional.

The landmark case Schenck v. United States, (1919) set a standard for determining reasonable restrictions on the First Amendment right to free speech based on whether the speech, written or spoken, constituted a "clear and present danger." In this case, the danger was determined to be a risk to the United States' recruitment and conscription efforts during WW I, and in violation of the new 1917 Espionage Act; however, the concept has been used as a test in many cases through the years. The criteria for what constitutes unprotected speech was subsequently narrowed in Bradenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969) when the Court upheld the First Amendment rights of the Ku Klux Klan.

Schenck v. United States is also the source of Holmes' famous quote about the First Amendment not protecting a person "shouting fire in a crowded theater."

Background

Charles T. Schenck, General Secretary of the Socialist Party, was convicted under the recently enacted Espionage Act of 1917 of attempting to interfere with the operation of the United States Armed Forces by urging men to resist the draft.

Schenck, in his capacity as an official of the Socialist Party, was in charge of the Socialist headquarters where the Executive Committee met. According to meeting minutes found on the premises, the committee had issued a resolution on August 13, 1917 that 15,000 leaflets should be printed and distributed to men who had been drafted or were eligible for the draft.

Schenck undertook responsibility for printing and mailing the circulars, while his co-defendant, Dr. Elizabeth Baer (named in the full caption), had recorded the meeting minutes.

Quoting the 13th Amendment prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude, the Socialists claimed the 1917 Conscription Act (draft) violated the Constitution, and said that a conscript (draftee) is "little better than a convict." The pamphlet further claimed the draft was a "monstrous crime" against humanity, intended to benefit "Wall Street's chosen few." The literature also said, "Do not submit to intimidation," and exhorted men to "Assert Your Rights," but advocated only peaceful means of protest, such as petitioning for repeal of the Conscription Act.

Both Schenck and Baer were convicted in District Court of violating the Espionage Act, and appealed directly to the US Supreme Court.

US Supreme Court

In a brief prepared for the Court, Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer argued that "the fair test of protection by the constitutional guarantee of free speech is whether an expression is made with sincere purpose to communicate honest opinion or belief, or whether it masks a primary intent to incite to forbidden action, or whether it does, in fact, incite to forbidden action."1

Schenck further argued that his circular did not meet this standard because its clear intent was to persuade people to sign a petition urging Congress to repeal the Conscription Act, and did not recommend any action in violation of law.

The Justices and Schenck apparently disagreed about Schenck's intent.

Oliver Wendell Holmes, writing the unanimous opinion of the Court, concluded the pamphlet's intent was to influence drafted men to resist enlistment, which would obstruct the government's war effort. Holmes acknowledged the circular would have been protected under the First Amendment during peace time, but that the United States' engagement with Germany in war changed the context.

"The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that the United States Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right."

Citing the Espionage Act of 1917, Holmes later stated:

"The statute of 1917 in section 4 (Comp. St. 1918 , 10212d) punishes conspiracies to obstruct as well as actual obstruction. If the act, (speaking, or circulating a paper,) its tendency and the intent with which it is done are the same, we perceive no ground for saying that success alone warrants making the act a crime."

(Congress extended the meaning of the term "espionage" to include openly expressing public opinion under circumstances in which the expression could be construed as helping the enemy)

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling and found against Schenck, who was jailed six months for his crime, and Baer, who was jailed for 90 days.

"Clear and present danger" was a test established Holmes established in the majority opinion for the Court.

Holmes' writing in Schenck was criticized for his use of the word "tendency," in describing the potential effect of exercising free speech. The "bad tendency" concept originated in 17th-century English case law, and its vagueness implied a potential for restricting free speech in the absence of actual danger.

Holmes took the criticism to heart, and was more careful not to frame subsequent First Amendment issues in terms that undermined the Bill of Rights.

These early cases that imposed rigid restrictions on free speech, ostensibly to preserve law and order, were overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969), which held that the government cannot restrict inflammatory speech unless its intention is to incite, or is likely to incite, "imminent lawless action."

1 Philip B. Kurland and Gerhard Casper, eds, 18 Landmark Briefs of the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Law 1037-38 [University Publication 1975]

Case Citation:

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)

For more information, see Related Links, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Schenk Vs USA is a US supreme court decision which aims to enforce Espionage act of 1917. It states that anyone distributing leaflets to draft-age men with an aim to discourage them from joining is guilty of hindering draft which is a punishable crime.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the decision in the US Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What year was schenk v US?

The decision in Schenck v. United States was handed down on March 3, 1919. Edward D. White was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.


What was the significance of the guinn v. United States case in 1915?

Guinn v. United States, was an important United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with provisions of state constitutions that set qualifications for voters.


How was the dred Scott decision good?

The direct answer to the question is that the Dred Scott decision was good for slave owners. In a larger sense it was not good at all. The decision by the US Supreme Court was more important to the United States than it was to slave holder Dred Scott. This was so because in an 1857 Supreme Court decision, slaves in the United States, whether in bondage or freed men & women, could never be US citizens. This decision was a setback for the antislavery abolitionists and a victory of sorts for slave owners. Taken in its totality it was a setback for the United States as a whole. The above answer is correct, however, if there was "good" in the Dredd Scott decision it was that the US Supreme Court made it clear what its position on slavery was. Thereby giving opponents of slavery ground to stand on in their efforts to limit or abolish slavery.


What document is the Supreme law of the United States?

The Constitution


The Hollywood studio system fell apart after a 1948 US Supreme Court decision in what case which ruled that the studio ownership of theatres represented a monopoly?

United States v. Paramount

Related questions

What year was schenk v US?

The decision in Schenck v. United States was handed down on March 3, 1919. Edward D. White was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.


What are the US Supreme Court cases Plessy v. Ferguson and Schenck v. United States?

Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) and Schenck v. United States, (1919) are two completely unrelated US Supreme Court cases. For more information on these cases, see Related Questions, below.


What did the supreme court decide in schenck v the United states?

Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.


Can a Supreme Court decision be appealed?

The Supreme Court's ruling is final and cannot be appealed. The United States Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices.


Who was the plaintiff in Schenck v. US?

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)The plaintiff was Charles T. Schenck, General Secretary of the Socialist Party, who was convicted under the Espionage Act of 1917 of attempting to interfere with the operation of the United States Armed Forces, and who appealed his conviction to the US Supreme Court.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What law was upheld as constitutional in the supreme court case of schenck v. United states?

Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies


Was Charles Schenck sent to prison after the Supreme Court ruling?

United States v. Schenck et al., 253 F. 212 (E. D. Pa. 1918)Yes. The US Supreme Court affirmed the US District decision. Judge Whitaker Thompson had found both Schenck and Baer guilty under the Espionage Act and sentenced them to remarkably short terms. The maximum penalty for Schenck's alleged crime was 10 years in prison, plus a fine, for each of the three counts charged. Schenck was only sentenced to six months in prison; Baer was sentenced to 90 days.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Schenck v United States?

(1919) *Congressional War Powers


What was the Supreme Court's decision in the case Northern Securities vs the United States?

In the case Northern Securities v. the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that Northern Securities violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.


What was the significance of the guinn v. United States case in 1915?

Guinn v. United States, was an important United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with provisions of state constitutions that set qualifications for voters.


What major Supreme Court decision changed school attendance in the United states?

Brown. VS Board of Education


Why As a result of actions during world war 1 Charles schenck was convicted in court. what did he do that led to the case?

Charles T. Schenck was the secretary of the Socialist Party of America in Philadelphiaduring the First World Warand involved in the 1919 Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States.Schenck had been indicted and tried for distributing 15,000 subversive leaflets to prospective military draftees during World War I. The leaflets urged the potential draftees to refuse to serve, if drafted, on the grounds that military conscription constituted involuntary servitude, which is prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment. The Federal government held the position that Schenck's actions violated the Espionage Act of 1917.Schenck was convicted, but he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the court decision violated his First Amendment rights. However, the Court unanimously upheld his conviction.