0
In 1967 it invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage. It ruled the Virginia law the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 was unconstitutional and overturned the Supreme court ruling Pace v. Alabama (1883). Sixteen State laws were overturned.
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State."
"There is patently no legitimate overriding purpose independent of invidious racial discrimination which justifies this classification. The fact that Virginia prohibits only interracial marriages involving white persons demonstrates that the racial classifications must stand on their own justification, as measures designed to maintain White Supremacy."
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What type of law is the case Loving v Virginia case based upon statute law amendment or administrative law?
Loving v. Virginia is a Supreme Court case that found the Virginia statute prohibiting interracial marriages to be unconstitutional.
Name of the case of 1967 that enabled interracial marriage?
The Loving Decision (Loving v Virginia).
Which court case declared struck down miscegenation laws?
Loving v. Virginia
What was the effect of the supreme courts decision in loving v Virginia?
What was the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia
What is the historical context surrounding the Loving v Virginia case?
In the state of Virginia it was illegal for people of different races to marry. Loving and Virginia married even though they were an interracial couple. They faced many legal and social problems in Virginia because of this.
Where did the Loving v Virgina place take place?
The couple in the Loving case were residents of Virginia who married in the District of Columbia and then returned to live in Caroline County, Virginia. A Caroline County grand jury indicted the couple for violation of Virginia's ban on interracial marriage.
Who are the Lovings in the US Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia?
Loving v. Virginia, 388 US 1 (1967)The Lovings were an interracial married couple (Mildred and Richard Perry Loving) who were charged for cohabitating in the state of Virginia, a state that outlawed interracial marriage (They were married in DC before returning to Virginia). Their marriage license was actually used against them in the case that went all the way to the US Supreme Court.Then in 1967, 8 years after their arrest, the Court overturned the law.
What was the case that claimed interracial marriages unconstitutional?
Loving v. Virginia was the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled that state laws prohibiting interracial marriage were unconstitutional.
What is the concurring opinion in Loving v. Virginia?
In the case of Loving v. Virginia, the concurring opinion was written by Justice Potter Stewart. He agreed with the majority's ruling that Virginia's anti-miscegenation law was unconstitutional but wrote a separate concurrence to emphasize that the freedom to marry was a fundamental right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. He argued that the Constitution prohibits interracial marriage restrictions just as it forbids measures that discriminate based on race.
When did the Court decide In Loving v Virginia?
in June 12, 1967
What is the outcome of case of Thomas Decuollo v. First Montauk Securities?
the case was dismissed,
Did the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia ever rule on the constitutionality of Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage?
No, but there is a pending case: Harris v. McDonnell, 5:13-cv-00077-MFU-RSB. Since Virginia's ban was ruled unconstitutional in another case before this case could be resolved, this case was on hold pending the outcome of the appeal of the Eastern District case (Bostic v. Rainey) before the 4th Circuit. On July 28, 2014, the 4th Circuit struck down Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage.
