IF the term "containment" was ever used in WW2, it certainly wasn't meant in the same context as the "cold war" containment...there were no nuclear weapons during 99% of WW2. Atomic weapons created the "cold war." Without atomic weapons, the Soviets/Red Chinese/etc. would've been fighting the US more times than just Korea and Vietnam...and they would have been "declared total wars." Since Nukes wouldn't have existed, it would have been "war as usual." Man's been fighting wars since before recorded time. Why should things change now(?)...because of atomic weapons they changed! Nukes DO EXIST; and they have since 1945. Thus, the cold war. It was important because the Communists were violating most of the values that the free world considered important. And the communists were seemingly getting more aggressive...therefore, the free world resisted them.
It stopped the spead of communism.
Hardly, as there was no communism to stop. Just Totalitarian Dictatorship.
It was important because it stopped the spread of communism
containment-
President Harry Truman isssued the policy of containment
Communist containment.
united nations
George Keenan
containment-
containment
containment
President Harry Truman isssued the policy of containment
Communist containment.
The term "containment policy" that most US people are familiar with is the "containment of communism" during cold war. Meaning, stopping the spread of communism world wide. Actually the answer your looking for is the Marshall Plan
Containment. VN & Korea were containment.
The Eisenhower and Truman Doctrines
Containment.
Foreign Service Officer, George F. Kennan, is the author of the policy on containment. Containment was the strategy the US used during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.
The US adopted a policy called 'containment'
united nations