Obama, Pelosi and Reid had a super majority in Congress for 2 years. Before that, Pelosi and Reid had a super majority under Bush for 2 years.
During those years of democrat domination, they failed to pass a budget for over 865 days, yet they blame it on Bush and the GOP.
Another observationDuring the first two years of the Obama Administration, when the Democrats had a majority in Congress, they were not always a unified block and they lacked the 60 votes in the Senate to pass legislation opposed by Republicans - unless they also got some Republican support. They were also trying to deal with a very serious economic situation, where there was substantial disagreement as to the best way to proceed. As a result, much legislation was was hard fought, requiring a long time to reach any version that could be passed.two thirds majority.
The President
Yes, but the majority party (not of congress- just what is considered the majority party according to laws) is determined by the executive branch aka the president.The most recent example, while Bush was still in office the democrats took control of Congress, but the majority party of the country was still considered Republican. Currently our President (Obama) as well as the majority of Congress are Democrat but if at their next election Congress shifts to a majority of Republicans the country's majority party would still be considered the Democrats, because of the presidentAdded: The initial answer is incorrect. The majority party in Congress is ALWAYS the numerically superior party, regardless of WHO the President is. The President has nothing whatsoever to do with naming the majority party, the voters decide who it will be by putting more members of one party in office, rather than the other.
Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
A new Vice President is nominated by the President and must be approved by a majority vote of both houses of Congress.
The U.S. Constitution, Amendment XXV, Section 2 states, "Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress."
There is no such thing as a "majority president". A person who runs for the office runs as a canadate for one of two parites. At various times the Congress is controlled by one party, but this is not the case at all times. For example when Obama came into office the Democrats had the majority, but now it is the Republicans. Your question implies that a president who holds the majority can get things done. This is sometimes true, but not always true.
The President has to nominate someone to be Vice President, but that said person can only be Vice President with the majority vote of both Houses of Congress
For most of the time while Johnson was in office the congress was not even "seated" in 1865. When the congress did get back in session Johnson had already handled many of the problems at that time.
informing Congress that he or she is no longer disabled, provided the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet do not challenge his or her decision.
informing Congress that he or she is no longer disabled, provided the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet do not challenge his or her decision.
If the office of vice-president becomes vacant , the president nominates someone to fill the position and both houses of Congress must confirm the nomination to make it official.This law appears in amendment 25, clause two:Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.