0
The decision in this case represented a tidal shift of power between the states and federal government, dictated by the Article VI Supremacy Clause, as did many of the Court's decisions during Marshall's tenure. Although the concept of nationalism is often decried, in this instance federal supremacy was necessary to national economic growth.
Gibbons was the first case in which the Supreme Court of the US held that Congress had the power to regulate commerce among the states via the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). Until this case, Congress hadn't exercised its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.
Most states had established laws regulating commerce under the Articles of Confederation, which preceded the US Constitution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the US government had little power to intervene or influence state laws; the Constitution elevated the authority of the United States over the states in many areas, emphasizing national supremacy over state sovereignty. The States resisted this intrusion by arguing they retained sovereign rights to control their own territory under the Tenth Amendment and that they hadn't ceded this right when the Constitution was ratified.
The net effect of conflicting state laws was restriction of trade and travel between the states, representing an inconvenience to travelers and inhibiting national economic growth. Gibbons v. Ogden has been called "the emancipation proclamation of American commerce" for its support of capitalism and a free market economy.
Gibbons v. Ogden prevented states from establishing or enforcing similar monopolistic transportation laws, encouraging growth of steamboat travel and cargo shipping. This expanded trade opportunities between states, boosting states' economies. Landlocked states were better able to participate in regional trade because they gained access to all navigable US waters. The decision in Gibbons created opportunities for the development of more efficient and sophisticated means of transporting people and goods, such as the railroad.
Case Citation:
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoThe Court found that an act of Congress relating to interstate commerce superseded a conflicting New York law due to the Supremacy Clause.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What wwas the result of the supreme court ruling in gibbons v. ogden?
ruling* Gibbons v. Ogden*
What was the result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons vs. Ogden?
the court defined interstate
What was the conflict of gibbons vs Ogden supreme court case?
the court defined interstate
Was Gibbons v Ogden the only case in Supreme Court history that went without a decision?
The US Supreme Court made a decision in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824). See Related Questions, below, for a discussion of that decision.
What was the date of the US Supreme Court's decision in Gibbons v Ogden?
Gibbons v. Ogden was argued before the US Supreme Court on February 5, 1924, and the Court released its decision on March 2, 1824. Gibbons established Congress had sole constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
Gibbons vs Ogden was a Supreme Court Case in 1824 that was the first to address the?
The commerce clause
Who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the case of Gibbons vs Ogden?
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.
What case resulted in the supreme court in a ruling the grant congress board powers over interstate commerce?
Gibbons v. Ogden is the name of the case that resulted in the Supreme Court in a ruling that grants Congress board powers over interstate commerce.
Which supreme court case is correctly paired with the constitutional issue it addressed?
Gibbons v. Ogden -- interstate commerce
The supreme court ruling in gibbons v ogden expanded the?
Commerce power to include all commercial interactions
What group benefited from the supreme court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden?
Federal government
What was the result of the supreme court ruling in gibbon vs Ogden?
the court defined interstate
