answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Hernandez v. Texas was an appeal of a Texas Supreme Court decision that upheld the exclusion of Mexican-American jurors from a trial in which the defendant was Mexican-American.

The US Supreme Court determined the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause applied to more than two races, and that Mexican-Americans (and others) could not be excluded on the basis of race. This was a reasonable extension of prior interpretation of the Amendment.

In the opinion of the Court, Chief Justice Earl Warren cited a nearly identical case, Strauder v. West Virginia, (1879), as precedent. In Strauder, the Court declared otherwise qualified African-Americans couldn't be excluded from jury duty. Strauder was reaffirmed by numerous other cases, such as Gibson v. Mississippi, (1896), Carter v. Texas,(1900), Norris v. Alabama, (1935), etc. The Warren Court adhered to the doctrine of stare decisis, with the only exception being the particular group(s) to which the decision applied.

Case Citation:

Hernandez v. Texas, 347 US 475 (1954)

User Avatar

Gillian Rutherford

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Hernandez v. Texas was an appeal of a Texas Supreme Court decision that upheld the exclusion of Mexican-American jurors from a trial in which the defendant was Mexican-American.

The US Supreme Court determined the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause applied to more than two races, and that Mexican-Americans (and others) could not be excluded on the basis of race. This was a reasonable extension of prior interpretation of the Amendment.

In the opinion of the Court, Chief Justice Earl Warren cited a nearly identical case, Strauder v. West Virginia, (1879), as precedent. In Strauder, the Court declared otherwise qualified African-Americans couldn't be excluded from jury duty. Strauder was reaffirmed by numerous other cases, such as Gibson v. Mississippi, (1896), Carter v. Texas,(1900), Norris v. Alabama, (1935), etc. The Warren Court adhered to the doctrine of stare decisis, with the only exception being the particular group(s) to which the decision applied.

Case Citation:

Hernandez v. Texas, 347 US 475 (1954)

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the significance of Hernandez v. Texas?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which Supreme Court ruling said that the Fourteenth Amendment protected members of all racial groups not just blacks and whites?

Texas v. Hernandez


What is the significance of Texas v Johnson?

flag burning was unconstitutional


When did Amado V. Hernandez die?

Amado V. Hernandez died in 1970.


What was the significance of Hermandez v Texas?

It extended the fourteenth amendment protections to mexican americans


What argument did defense attorney make in Hernandez v Texas?

i dont even kno i asked the same dang question


What is the meaning of ang panday by amado v hernandez?

meaning of ang panday by amado v. hernandez


What was the result of the supreme court ruling in Texas v. hernandez?

The ruling clarified that the Fourteenth Amendment protected members of all racial groups.


When was Shawn Hernandez born?

Shawn Hernandez was born on February 11, 1973, in Houston, Texas, USA.


How did the supreme court in Hernandez v. Texas affect civil rights for all racial groups in America?

It declared that all racial groups were protected equally by the Fourteenth Amendment.


What is the pen name of Amado Hernandez?

The pen name of Amado Hernandez is Amado V. Hernandez. He was a Filipino writer and labor leader known for his poetry and social realist writings that focused on the struggles of the working class.


When was Brianne Hernandez born?

Brianne Hernandez was born on December 31, 1983, in San Antonio, Texas, USA.


When was Carissa Hernandez born?

Carissa Hernandez was born on January 31, 1979, in San Antonio, Texas, USA.