Jefferson wanted a strict interpretation to give more power to the states, while hamilton favored a broad interpretation to streengthen the central government. Also, Jefferson wanted to give the common people more opportunities to participate in government while hamilton believed commoners were ignorant and not capable of self-government
Thomas Jefferson believed that the federal government was one with limited powers, specifically, only those enumerated in the Constitution and that state governments retained all other powers. The Tenth Amendment stated that all powers not delegated to the United States nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people. Hamilton believed the federal government had all powers necessary and proper to carry out the powers enumerated in the Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 says Congress has power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying out execution of the enumerated powers. These seem to conflict with one another. Whenever questions concerning whether the Constitution gave the federal government or the state governments power over a particular issue, Jefferson felt the Constitution should be interpreted to give the state the power, whereas Hamilton felt it should be interpreted to give the federal government the power.
british
Thomas Jefferson was part of the Democratic - Republican Party and believed the Constitution should be taken at face value without open interpretation. Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, believed the opposite.
Absolutely not. Parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. Parties were a result of differing political views, though not mentioned in the constitution, they are not banned either.
He denounced both slavery and the Constitution for permitting its existence.
There was different views on the constitution. Some wanted to interpret the Constitution loosely and look for as many loopholes as possible. While the other side wanted a strong central government and wanted to stick to exactly what the Constitution said.
Hamilton believed that the federal government could do as they needed to govern the country. He believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
Hamilton believed that the federal government could do as they needed to govern the country. He believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
british
He believed in the constitution, fought for it, lived it.
I know some views that the Republicans have on the United States Constitution. I also know twelve ways that the Republicans want to change the U.S. Constitution. There is no straight-on election of senators
Jefferson's views differed from Hamilton's because Jefferson believed that implied powers are the powers that are "absolutely necessary" to carry out expressed powers, but Hamilton thought it meant that they were not expressly forbidden in the Constitution.
The federalists wanted a constitution to gain more national government power.
Henry against Hamilton for
There isn't one. Article 3 of the US Constitution enables the judiciary to interpret laws. That's why you have so many Justices in the Supreme Court who have varying views on how to interpret the Constitution. For example, Justice Scalia is known to be one who thinks the Constitution isn't flexible, while Ginsberg is generally for flexibility.
Thomas Jefferson was part of the Democratic - Republican Party and believed the Constitution should be taken at face value without open interpretation. Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, believed the opposite.
Absolutely not. Parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. Parties were a result of differing political views, though not mentioned in the constitution, they are not banned either.