answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Nerva (96-98).

Nerva was appointed by the Senate to succeed Domitian, and was the first Emperor who did not owe his advancement to military force or influence. He associated with himself Marcus Ulpius Trajanus, then in command of the army on the Rhine. Nerva ruled only sixteen months; but during that time he restored tranquillity among the people, conferring happiness and prosperity upon every class.

Trajan (98-117).

Nerva was succeeded by Trajan, whose character has its surest guaranty in the love and veneration of his subjects; and it is said that, long afterwards, the highest praise that could be bestowed on a ruler was that he was "more fortunate than Augustus, and better than Trajan." Trajan was a soldier, and, if he lacked the refinements of a peaceful life, he was nevertheless a wise and firm master.

He added to the Empire Dacia, the country included between the Danube and the Theiss, the Carpathians and the Pruth. This territory became so thoroughly Romanized that the language of its inhabitants to-day is founded on that of their conquerors nearly eighteen centuries ago. It was in honor of this campaign into Dacia that the famous Column of Trajan, which still remains, was erected.

Trajan also annexed to the Empire Arabia Petraea, which afforded an important route between Egypt and Syria. His invasion of Parthia, however, resulted in no permanent advantage.

During the reign of Trajan the Roman Empire reached the summit of its power; but the first signs of decay were beginning to be seen in the financial distress of all Italy, and the decline of the free peasantry, until in the next century they were reduced to a condition of practical serfdom.

The literature of Trajan's reign was second only to that of the Augustan age. His time has often been called the Silver Age Its prose writers were, however, unlike those of the Augustan age, far superior to its poets. The most famous prose writers were Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, and Quintilian.

The poets of this period were Juvenal, Persius, Martial, Lucan, and Statius, of whom the last two were of an inferior order.

Hadrian (117-138).

Trajan was succeeded by his cousin's son, Hadrian, a native of Spain. One of the first acts of Hadrian was to relinquish the recent conquests of Trajan, and to restore the old boundaries of the Empire. The reasons for this were that they had reached the utmost limits which could lend strength to the power of Rome, or be held in subjection without constant and expensive military operations. The people occupying the new conquests were hardy and warlike, scattered over a country easy of defence, and certain to strive constantly against a foreign yoke.

Hadrian displayed constant activity in travelling over the Empire, to overlook personally its administration and protection. He visited Britain, where he crushed the inroads of the Caledonians and built a fortified line of works, known as the Picts' Wall, extending from sea to sea. The remains of this great work are still to be seen, corresponding nearly to the modern boundary between England and Scotland. He also visited the East, where the Jews were making serious trouble, and completed their overthrow.

On his return to the city, the Emperor devoted himself to its adornment. Several of his works, more or less complete, still remain. The most famous of these is the mausoleum (Tomb) of Hadrian, now known as the Castle of San Angelo.

Hadrian was afflicted with bad health, suffering much from diseases from which he could find no relief. On account of this, and to secure a proper succession, he associated with himself in the government Titus Aurelius Antoninus, and required him to adopt Marcus Annius Verus and Lucius Verus. In 138, soon after this arrangement was made, Hadrian died, leaving the Empire to Titus.

Titus Aurelius Antoninus Pius (138-161).

Antoninus, a native of Gaul, was fifty-two years old when he succeeded to the throne. The cognomen PIUS was conferred upon him by the Senate on account of the affectionate respect which he had shown for Hadrian. He was a man of noble appearance, firm and prudent, and under him the affairs of state moved smoothly.

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (161-180).

On the death of Antoninus, Marcus Annius Verus succeeded him under the title of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus.

The Moors made an invasion into Spain; the barbarians broke into Gaul; the army in Britain attempted to set up another Emperor; and the Parthians in the East were in an uneasy state. The Eastern war, however, ended favorably, and the Parthian king purchased peace by ceding Mesopotamia to Rome. But the returning army brought with it a pestilence, which spread devastation throughout the West. The Christians were charged with being the cause of the plague, and were cruelly persecuted. Among the victims were Justin Martyr at Rome, and Polycarp at Smyrna.

The death of Lucius Verus in 168 released Aurelius from a colleague who attracted attention only by his unfitness for his position. The Emperor was thus relieved of embarrassments which might well have become his greatest danger. The remainder of his reign, however, was scarcely less unhappy.

The dangers from the troublesome barbarians grew greater and greater. Rome had now passed the age of conquest, and began to show inability even to defend what she had acquired. For fourteen years Aurelius was engaged on the frontiers fighting these barbarians, and endeavoring to check their advance. He died at Vienna while thus occupied, in the fifty-ninth year of his life (180).

Peace was shortly afterwards made with the barbarians, a peace bought with money; an example often followed in later times, when Rome lacked the strength and courage to enforce her wishes by force of arms.

Marcus Aurelius was the Philosopher of the Empire. His tastes were quiet; he was unassuming, and intent on the good of the people. His faults were amiable weaknesses; his virtues, those of a hero. His _Meditations_ have made him known as an author of fine tastes and thoughts. With him ended the line of the Good Emperors. After his death, Rome's prosperity and power began rapidly to wane.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The 5 Good Emperors of the Roman Empire were very giving, and while they ruled Rome, it was very peaceful, and Rome wasn't at war too much. The Emperors were caring and giving, and ruled for the benefit of the people, like when Vespasian built the Colosseum from Nero's pool and turned it into a great place of entertainment for the people. Overall, they're called the 5 Good Emperors because they were good to the citizens.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the 5 good emperors of rome and what did they accomplish?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History
Related questions

What were there 5 of in ANCIENT ROME?

The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors


Who are all of the 5 good emperors?

The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.


Who are the first 5 emperors of Rome?

Augustus Tiberius Caligula Claudius Nero


What defense measure did the Romans use to protect Rome in the period of decline after 5 good emperors?

They built a wall around city to keep out invaders


What defensive measure did the Romans use to protect Rome in the period of decline after the 5 Good Emperors?

They made all residents citizens to bolster their loyalty, and settled the incoming Goths on the borders as a buffer in the east, and enlisted them into the army to bolster it.


Who was one ruler who had absolute power in rome?

Julius Caesar


Was the roman empire a good or bad thing?

_Bad_Good"> Bad Good1.Caligula (37-41) 1.Nevra (96-98)2.Elagabalus (218-224) 2.Trajan (98-117)3.Commodus (180-192) 3.Hadrian (117-138)4.Nero (54-68) 4.Antoninus Pius (138-161)5.Domitian (81-96) 5.Marcus Aurelius (161-180)


Who were the first 5 emperors of Rome in order?

The first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - NeroThe first five emperors were the Julio-Claudian dynasty. They were #1- Augustus#2-Tiberius#3- Caligula#4- Claudius#5 - Nero


How tall is Sydne Rome?

Sydne Rome is 5' 5".


Who are the 4 Julian emperors of Rome?

The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.


What are 5 specific ways the Roman Empire declined?

The migration of Germanic people into Europe led to the decline of the Roman Empire. The empire also became too large to govern.


What made the 5 good emperors good?

The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. The term five good emperors involve a bias on the part of Machiavelli because not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."