answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The word, for a proposed scientific explanation, for a set of observations, is a "Hypothesis".

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The word is conclusion, as it shows the chemical or physical or any other changes occured during the practical duration.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would be the word for a proposed scientific explanation for a set of observations?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

Explanation based on scientific knowledge resulting from numerous observations and experiements?

Scientific Theory! ------- Induction.. also it is made up of a... claim ,data ,and science knowledge


Studying the effect of one thing on anothher in order to test a hypothesis is a?

An organized process for gathering observations is the scientific method. The scientific method consists of steps that help researchers get accurate information about research.


A is a possible explanation for a set of observation or answer to a scientific question?

why would they tell me to answer it when i was the one typing the question? i am so very confused ! will someone answer my question plz! A Hypothesis ..... By - Kyo :D


What type of debate would you use to discuss evolution?

The facts and the evidence. Debates are won by good debaters. Scientific discoveries are won by hard work, attention to methodological detail, hypothesis testing and repeating experiments and validating repeated observations. The scientific method is intellectually honest. Debates can be pure sophistry.Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact and not debatable any longer. The theory of evolution by natural selection is the best explanation we have of the fact of evolution. This is up for discovery, not debate in the usual sense. Bring your evidence, or keep silent. Good advice for all creationists.Plenty of material on evidences here.talkorigins.orgthepandasthumb.orgLinks here also.


What type of hypothesis would an astronomer make?

An astronomer might formulate a hypothesis to explain a phenomenon or make predictions about celestial objects. For example, they could hypothesize about the composition of a distant star, the origin of a certain cosmic event, or the behavior of a particular celestial body. Hypotheses in astronomy are often based on observations, existing theories, and scientific principles, and they are typically tested through further observations, experiments, or data analysis.

Related questions

What is a proposed explanation for a scientific problem?

that would be either a hypothesis or theory


Explanation based on scientific knowledge resulting from numerous observations and experiements?

Scientific Theory! ------- Induction.. also it is made up of a... claim ,data ,and science knowledge


What is An observation that contradicts your explanation?

That would depend on your observations and your explanation.


How did scientists before scientific revolution do their work?

Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.


How did scientist before the scientific revolution do their work?

Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.


What is that which cannot be explained by scientific method?

If I had to say something it would be anything that cannot be tested. Existence of god, ghosts, etc. as the basis of the scientific method is to prove a hypothesis through tests and observations. Kinda butchered the explanation but you get what I mean. (I hope.)


How did scientists before the scientists revolution do their work?

Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.


How did scientist before the scientist revolution do their work?

Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.


What are explanation based on many observations that are supported by experimental results?

i would assume it is known as a solution


How would you improve the characteristics of the seedless orange?

i would assume you would just cross seedless oranges but is there a more scientific explanation? i would assume you would just cross seedless oranges but is there a more scientific explanation?


In which part of the scientific method would you record your observations?

You would obviously record your observations in the first part of the scientific method i.e titled commonly as "Observation". Because only after recording your observation you can move onto the second part of scientific method i.e "Questioning".


What are the qualifications for a scientific explanation to be testable?

Scientific explanations are testable if confidence in the explanation could be undermined by a failure to observe the predicted outcome. One should be able to imagine outcomes that would disprove the explanation.