For all intents and purposes, there would be no difference. You would not actually be "infected again" by the same virus, you would just have more virus particles in your body perhaps involving more of your cells. That could make you feel sicker, but you don't really have what would be called a new infection, just more of the same causative organisms joined in the battle with your immune system. Once your body's development of the right antibodies for that virus catches up, it will kill all of the viruses you have in your body at that time. Therefore, the duration of your symptoms will not be lengthened by the interim contact with more of the same virus.
See the related question below which may add to this explanation.
They acquired it by becoming infected but surviving the infection.
You are born with innate immunity which consists of natural barriers to infection. Acquired is developed after birth when you come into contact with antigens
explain the difference between sovereign immunity qualified immunity charitable immunity and interspousal immunity?
Vaccines are used to prevent infection; to create immunity so you do not get the infectious disease if you are later exposed to it after the vaccination has rendered you immune. If you already have caught the infection, vaccines will not be needed since the infection itself will provide immunity once the sickness is over. Anti-viral medicines are used after an infection to lessen the symptoms and speed recovery. See the related questions below for additional information.
Humoral Immunity- acquired immunity in which the role of circulating antibodies is predominant. Natural Immunity- the resistance of the normal animal to infection
acquired
microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses
mostly antiviral immunity is the result of cell mediated immunity and antibacterial immunity is result of humoral immunity
Pregnancy does not give you immunity from chlamydia infection.
thymus
true
Immunity.