I think that goes back to Albert Einstein, though he only theorised about it, but was correct (E = mc2). To make it a practical process, I would nominate Enrico Fermi as the foremost scientist in the field, though also Robert Oppenheimer was principal in developing the A-bomb.
During the WW2 Manhattan Project nuclear reactors were built to produce plutonium. After the war people realised they could be adapted for power production, and also in the US the wish to have nuclear powered submarines was also a driving force.
The first ever nuclear reactor was demonstrated in 1942, but this did not produce any useful output. Power reactors were developed in the mid 1950's
The first nuclear chain reaction was demonstrated in 1942
Nuclear energy was discovered in 1898.
Moises Fedirick Albesa
I consider that the nuclear energy is a chance for the future.
He helped people and also he developed nuclear energy which help people
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Solar energy is certainly safer than nuclear energy, but decidedly more expensive with much greater space requirements...at this time. As solar and other alternative energy sources are developed, it is reasonable to assume that the costs will decrease. Whether or not they will ever decrease to the costs per kilowatt hour that nuclear energy can achieve remains to be seen.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
I consider that the nuclear energy is a chance for the future.
I consider that the nuclear energy is a chance for the future.
nuclear energy was first invented for a weapon of mass destruction (WOMD) but it was later developed as a main ingredient in the narcotic known as Molly (MDMA)
SONE stands for Supporters Of Nuclear Energy. They are an organization that want to promote nuclear energy as not only an acceptable means of energy production, but a necessary one in order to face the future energy demands of the world. They feel nuclear energy would help developed countries to keep a sustainable economy.
All available energy sources are open to a country like India. They have nuclear capabilities so even nuclear power would be a developable option.
He helped people and also he developed nuclear energy which help people
No. Fireworks rely on chemical rather than nuclear energy. They are driven by an oxidation-reduction reaction. Fireworks were developed centuries before we discovered nuclear fission.
He helped people and also he developed nuclear energy which help people
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Because nothing to safely hold the process in has been developed yet.
The nuclear energy is not so developed in the poor countries.
Solar energy is certainly safer than nuclear energy, but decidedly more expensive with much greater space requirements...at this time. As solar and other alternative energy sources are developed, it is reasonable to assume that the costs will decrease. Whether or not they will ever decrease to the costs per kilowatt hour that nuclear energy can achieve remains to be seen.