Wives were never their husbands property. The wife's property did become her husband's. But a husband could not sell his wife. Divorce was hard to get so he couldn't even leave her. He was obligated to support her. He had to protect her. He could not kill her. If got a divorce and it was considered his fault (e.g. he committed adultery) he had to support her for the rest of her life.
In Western cultures since the middle ages a dowry, paid by the bride's family to the groom, was more common.
Women had more legal rights in ancient Egypt than in Colonial America.
You have asked a complex question. It's complex because no single law was ever passed at a certain date. A complete answer would involve a comprehensive survey of laws in early America, laws that controlled inheritance and property. There was no single law that stated, "Women are the property of their husbands". She was completely under her husband's control. She became his legal property or chattel. She had no legal existence in her own right. If she earned any wages they belonged to her husband. Property she brought into the marriage could be taken to pay his debts. He could beat her but not cause permanent injury or death.
A woman's place in the colonial world was carved out by ancient legal principals and traditions that evolved over centuries such as:
Women were not usually considered legally competent and if they were married they were the "property" of their husbands. Native Americans were not US citizens and later became wards of the Federal government when they were forced onto reservations.
Yes, they can.
me mum
No. The world need us to be free.
During the US Civil War, the women did what women through the ages have always done during times of war: stayed home and tended to the farms and work that their husbands had left in order to fight. the women still raised their children, oversaw the workings of the farmer household, and sometimes became involved in war efforts to help defend their own property.
Yes, culturally, they see the man as the one in charge vs the US where mates are equals.
yes, because that was the era when women were becoming more independent/
Answers:There are many reasons:Women work outside of the house now and can support themself and their family with or without the help of the husband.The vows taken were taken more seriously when religion was more a part of the nuclear family. To many people they are now just words.The property laws that prevented women from leaving have been modernized and they can take their separately owned property and their share of their marital property with them in the case of a divorce. Modernization of laws and the fading away of a male-dominated society in the Western world has made divorce more common and more accessible.Women are no longer considered the property of their husbands and they do not have to leave their children behind if they leave the marriage as they did in the past.Divorced women are no longer shunned by society.People do not take marriage as seriously as they did in the past.
One thought:Titus 2:3-5 tells us that the 'aged women' should "teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed. "(KJV)
indians, slaves, women, and those with limited property
a long time ago women weren't allowed to vote or to own property.
Britain