knights used coats of arms to alow themselves to be reconized in battle.
Coats of arms were used by knights to identify themselves to friend a foe when they were encased in armor and not otherwise recognizable.
Colors and animals were, and are, used in coats of arms because they are used a symbols.
Coats of arms were used to identify individuals of high status on the battle field when they were otherwise unrecognizable in their armor.
(1 pt) Christian knights
In the Middle Ages, coats of arms were used exclusively by the nobility on flags and armour. Fishermen would not have coats of arms.
European tradition, is a design belonging to a particular person (or group of people) and used by them in a wide variety of ways. Historically, they were used by knights to identify them apart from enemy soldiers. In Continental Europe, commoners were able to adopt burgher arms. Unlike seals and emblems, coats of arms have a formal description. In the 21st century, coats of arms are still in use by a variety of institutions and individuals. - Cited from Wikipedia, aswell as generic knowlege.
Usually they used the coat of arms of their familly.
Yes. It is commonly used in scholarly coats-of-arms.
Heraldy is pretty much a coat of arms, and knights used it to identify different kingdoms
The plural of "coat of arms" is "coats of arms".
Coats of arms do not themselves have surnames.