Sharecropping
Yes it was. That was the whole point behind white slave owners arguments for slavery. They argued there plantations could not run properly without slaves picking the amount of cotton needed to be picked daily. Without the amount being reached the South could not export its most important crop.
no economic growth cannot be possible without devlopment
dialogue
Some people would say no, but the truth is yes.
economic power is more important because without an economic power we would have a military power.
The "Peculiar Institution" was and remains a common euphemism for slavery in the U.S. southern slave states. People to this day will speak of "the South's Peculiar Institution" as a way of referring to slavery without actually using the word "slavery."
The "Peculiar Institution" was and remains a common euphemism for slavery in the U.S. southern slave states. People to this day will speak of "the South's Peculiar Institution" as a way of referring to slavery without actually using the word "slavery."
Chinchonmatajanña
The plantation system of the south had been built on slavery, in many Southerners feared that their economy couldn't survive without it.
The Confederate Constitution prohibited the international slave trade but permitted the domestic institution without restriction and forbade any Confederate state to abolish it.
Cheap free labor was the only way of producing cotton - and lots of it. Following the invention of the cotton gin, cotton become "king" in the South, comprising a majority of its exports. Without slavery, cotton could not be harvested, and the large plantation holders would surely be in ruins. Though the owners of huge plantations did not amass to a majority in the South, they were the political leaders and drove the economy. For the economic and political success of both the South and the plantation owners, the institution of slavery had to continue.
No. If the practice of slavery was in fact evil, then Lincoln had to hold to his view that slavery should not be expanded into the territories. Confederates were defending an institution which absolutely contradicted Jefferson's statement in the Declaration of Indepence that "all men are created equal." Southerners sidestepped this contradiction by claiming that the war was "about states' rights." But without slavery there would have been no Civil War.
Yes it was. That was the whole point behind white slave owners arguments for slavery. They argued there plantations could not run properly without slaves picking the amount of cotton needed to be picked daily. Without the amount being reached the South could not export its most important crop.
no economic growth cannot be possible without devlopment
Slavery had of course been a persistent and contradictory issue since the framing of the US Constitution, having been awkwardly written into it through numerous compromises. The reason 'why' was economic development. Without slavery, the agrarian culture of the southern states would have died out long before 1860. It's commonly taught in early grade school that cotton was king in the south at that time. But slavery was actually on the way out because of the economic forces associated with harvesting cotton---it was hand labor, it was slow and it was losing its profitability. Then at the turn of the 19th century, the Cotton Gin was invented which effectively increased the output efficiency of southern cotton causing the institution of southern slavery to rebound dramatically. Between 1830 to 1850 the output of cotton rose by a factor of 4 using the same slave labor base.
slavery is when someone is forced against there will to work without pay.
Could the colonies labor problem have been solved without slavery?