Depending on your context:
it is correct to say something could be 'fatal to your future'. It is also correct to say something could be 'fatal to you in future'.
it's also correct to say something could be 'fatal foryou in future', or 'fatal for you in thefuture', and so on.
For example:
These investment advisors have a very poor record: entrusting your money to them could prove fatal to your future.' The implication is here that your future financial security is at risk.
You nearly fell off the roof last time; fixing the tiles yourself could prove fatal to you in future.
Risking this kind of exercise too often with your heart condition might well be fatal for you in (the) future.
You'll need to try out the full sentence, to see how the words look and feel when you put them all together.
The future perfect tense of correct is will have corrected.
The correct spelling is "Back to the Future."
It is correct to use "which is" when talking about a singular future unknown situation or option. If referring to multiple future unknown situations or options, it is correct to use "which are."
Yes
This sentence should be correct.
The correct spelling is future.
is it correct in future form when we say " you are requested to submit the programme" or "you are request to submit the programme"
The correct answer is "will have hidden".
No, not quite. You should say: I look forward to working with you in the future.
The correct singular third person conjugation of the verb "to be" in the future perfect tense is "will have been."
All of the answers are correct.
This sentence is grammatically correct but does not have much meaning.