Neither... or both depending on how you view the issue.
12.5 hertz or 50 hertz are not measurements of power or energy. They are measurements of frequency. 12.5 hertz reverses the flow of electrons in the circuit 12.5 times each second. 50 hertz does so 50 times each second.
Power is measured in the voltage (how far above and below 0 volts this wave goes) and by how many electrons are moving (the current of the unit). We take and multiply the two units of measurement to derive the wattage of the signal.
Watts tell us how much instantaneous power each of these signals would have.
Probably not. A 2007 study in South Korea in rice fields showed that sounds at 125Hz and 250Hz made genes rbcS and Ald, that are known to respond to light, more active whereas sound waves at 50HZ made these genes less active. Latin music tends to be really active. If it is soft then maybe. Studies confirm that plants prefer classical music like "Moonlight Sonata"
no
3-50hz mean = -47
125Hz-36,000 Hz for monkeys compared to 20Hz-20,000 Hz for humans.
125Hz-36,000 Hz for monkeys compared to 20Hz-20,000 Hz for humans.
more powerful most powerful
yes it is pssible to use , you can apply higher volt acording to ratio 400/50 ,and you can get more powe up to 8 times comparing to 50hz system.
Yes, but it may generate more harmonics
It is sound travelling through a dense medium, like iron, for example.
There should be no problem at all.
The mains supply in Scotland is 50Hz.
One cycle of a 125hz sine wave would last .008 seconds. Hz (hertz) refers to the frequency of the wave itself, that is, how many times the wave cycles in a second. To find the cycle length, then, simply divide 1 second by the frequency, in this case: 1/125 = .008.