Anarchy, authoritarian, totalitarian
Daimyo
Roman Emperors were absolute rulers. Therefore they were the most powerful men in the empire.
they gained power by believing that they were the most powerful of all of kami, the goddess of the sun
Philip II, Alexander the Great and generally most of the Argead Dynasty from which they belonged.
Answer this question… Which diagram correctly arranges systems of government in order from least powerful to mostpowerful?
Most totalitarian countries have a dictatorship by a despot who holds onto power. Most, but not all totalitarian countries adopt this economic system.
The tyrants replaced the aristocrats as rulers of the city-states. Aristocrats are members of rich and powerful families and ruled most city states. A middle class of merchants and artisans developed, wanting a say in government. Gradually, strength in cities shifted from aristocrats to merchants and artisans. As a result, aristocratic government was replaced by rulers called tyrants. <---- this was an essay question on one of my tests in 6th grade- I got an A :) !
Totalitarian states.
The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.The patricians were a class. At the beginning of the city, they were the rulers because they held most of the property. However over the years other classes of people became rich and powerful too. If a patrician were wealthy and had good family connections, he was generally into politics in some way.
By vanquishing most of the other rulers in Asia
Archaeologists think that this might explain why Kush had so many strong queen at a time when men ruled most kingdoms. They think that the powerful goddesses reminded everyone that women could be strong and wise rulers.