The petitioners (like plaintiffs) were John F. Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt (high school students), and Mary Beth Tinker, John's sister (Jr. high school student).
The respondent (like a defendant) in Tinker v. Des Moineswas the Des Moines Independent Community School District.
Case Citation:
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
Two justices, Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan II, wrote independent dissenting opinions in Tinker.
Justice Black disagreed with the Court's decision to allow students and teachers to use the schools as a platform for the expression of free speech, and believed policy matters should be left to school administration. Black cited the recent decision in Cox v. Louisiana, 379 US 536 (1965), in which the Court held the First Amendment right to exercise free speech was not absolute and "[does] not mean that everyone with opinions or beliefs to express may address a group at any public place and at any time."
According to Justice Black, the First Amendment had two components: the freedom to believe, and the freedom to act. He asserted the freedom to believe was absolute, but reminded the Court that it had historically made exceptions to the freedom to act for good cause. In this case, "good cause" involved the right of the schools to maintain discipline and control, and not cede this power to the students.
Justice Harlan believed the schools should have "the widest authority" to promulgate their own rules, provided the rules were motivated by legitimate reasons, and held the burden should be on the Petitioner (Tinker) to demonstrate the Respondent (Des Moines ISD) had a "desire to prohibit the expression of an unpopular point of view, while permitting expression of the dominant opinion," rather than maintain order. In his view, the school had acted in good faith and should prevail.
Case Citation:
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The respondent in Tinker v. Des Moines was the Des Moines Independent Community School District. The petitioners were John F. Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt (high school students), and Mary Beth Tinker, John's sister (Jr. high school student).
Case Citation:
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969), was primarily based on two events:
Tinker was a First Amendment case challenging the school district's right to make policies restricting students' and teachers' expression of free speech in school. In a 7-2 vote, the Court held the Fourteenth Amendment made the First Amendment applicable to the states, and determined students had a right to express their opinions in a non-disruptive manner.
Case Citation:
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
One argument was that the teens were not violent during their protest and caused no disruption.
the vietnam war
Tinker et al. V. Des Moines Independent Community School District, et al., 1969 Tinker and several students were suspended for wearing black arm bands in protest of the Vietnam war. The school argues that it had an interest in limiting free speech to preserve the peace at school because the arm bands could provoke retaliation. The Supreme Court didn't buy the argument noting specifically that the protest was peaceful and passive, and that the threat of some theoretical disturbance was insufficient grounds to suspend the first amendment, noting that virtually any spoken word in class might provoke or offend someone. The court ruled that "in our system, state operated schools may not be the enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students"
Yes, of course it's legal to petition the US Supreme Court. When discussing Supreme Court cases, it's important to realize "petition" means to file an appeal of a case already decided by the lower courts. It does not mean to send a signature petition in protest or support of a decision. You are within your legal rights to send such a document, but the Court is not required to read it.
By holding a protest march
Very politely and orderly, compared to today. They could - and did - write letters of protest to their Members of Congress and to local newspapers. The US President got his share of letters too. Although there was radio, phoning in to talk shows was not done. Protest marches with banners and all also were a 'normal' means of protest.
over time, the supreme court became less likely to allow restrictions on free speech
To Protest the War students wore armbands and were suspended Students Sued the school district for not allowing them the right of freedom of speech Lower courts ruled in favor of the school district Students took the case to the Supreme court and won
No, they are their if the community does not like the new law. That is when they can protest to over throw the law. Only the legislature can decide to make a new law that goes to the President either to pass it or to veto.
it is to prosuade a composition of a protest,;reduce insiantisy,; killers
Well, is India an independent country? Check yes.
You may contact the district attorney or the state attorney general.
Tinker siblings wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War in 1965. School authorities suspended the Tinker siblings, leading to a legal case, Tinker v. Des Moines. The case reached the Supreme Court in 1969, which ruled in favor of the Tinkers, establishing students' rights to free speech in schools.
An economic protest party would be something like the greenback party or populist party.
Tinker et al. V. Des Moines Independent Community School District, et al., 1969 Tinker and several students were suspended for wearing black arm bands in protest of the Vietnam war. The school argues that it had an interest in limiting free speech to preserve the peace at school because the arm bands could provoke retaliation. The Supreme Court didn't buy the argument noting specifically that the protest was peaceful and passive, and that the threat of some theoretical disturbance was insufficient grounds to suspend the first amendment, noting that virtually any spoken word in class might provoke or offend someone. The court ruled that "in our system, state operated schools may not be the enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students"
the sutdents were suspended for wearing armbands to protest the war the students sued the school district for the loss of free speech the students lost their case in several lower courts the students won their case in the US Supreme Court
the sutdents were suspended for wearing armbands to protest the war the students sued the school district for the loss of free speech the students lost their case in several lower courts the students won their case in the us supreme court
there is to many protest in the last year because because now people are doing whatever they want and thats why we need more democracy in our community
Peaceful protest