Who would be at fault if you stopped at a stop sign looked both ways proceeded to cross and you were hit by a speeding motorist on a cell phone?

Answer

The motorist is clearly at fault; automobiles must ALWAYS yield to pedestrians, in any case.

Alternate Answer

The previous response assumed you were on foot. I'll assume were in a vehicle. When you looked both ways, you should have estimated the speed of any approaching vehicle and remained at the stop sign until there was an opening large enough to cross safely. It's going to be a lot harder for you to prove he was speeding than it will be for him to prove you did not yield right of way at a stop sign.

Improve Answer Discuss the question "Who would be at fault if you stopped at a stop sign looked both ways proceeded to cross and you were hit by a speeding motorist on a cell phone?" Watch Question

First answer by ID3452520937. Last edit by Knowledge. Contributor trust: 581 [recommend contributor]. Question popularity: 34 [recommend question]

Also see on Answers.com

Research your answer:

Answers.com > Wiki Answers > Categories > Business and Finance > Insurance > Auto Insurance > Auto Accidents and Insurance Claims > Who would be at fault if you stopped at a stop sign looked both ways proceeded to cross and you were hit by a speeding motorist on a cell phone?

Our contributors said this page should be displayed for the questions below. (Where do these come from)
If any of these are not a genuine rephrasing of the question, please help out and edit these alternates.
Who's at fault stop sign?  What are three different ways that you and monitor fault movement?