All of the above
skeptism
skeptism
biased
Biased sources are those that aren't fair to all sides. Unbiased sources just present the facts, without informing the reader how to think about those facts. Unbiased sources may not tell the whole story or may misrepresent facts. Unbiased sources should provide the information only, without persuasion.
Yes it would because you need to beliveve in other things aswell
The Bias rule recognizes that all sources have inherent biases or perspectives that can influence the information they present. It emphasizes the need to critically analyze sources and consider their potential biases when evaluating their credibility and reliability.
Primary sources of information are great because they are first hand information from someone who was there. Secondary sources are based on primary sources, and may be biased.
All biographies may be biased because they are written from the perspective of the author, who may have their own opinions, beliefs, or agendas that can influence the portrayal of the subject. Additionally, the author may only have access to certain sources or information, leading to an unbalanced representation of the person's life.
One way that journalists could slant a story is to use biased sources.
they may be biased
they may be biased