Because if the parents are not like that then the kids won't necessarily learn. It depends on the parent, and not all parents that way nor are all parents who are like that bad parents. It can be helpful in some cases whereas the child needs an extra boost.
Often it's because the parents themselves were brought up that way and now don't know anything different. The problem with that is that something that has worked on one child might not work as well on another. Communicating usually gets you further.
Most parents are rough on their children depending on the environment they are brought up in, some statistics have shown. To be too lenient in these cases will only be detrimental to the child, and so long as it doesn't amount to abuse, it's normally fine and helpful. The same is with communication as some parents are often forward or blunt or don't talk enough; so long as they are able to find a middle ground, it's usually okay.
He had no children and his parents name were Parker and Emily
Children take their cue on how to behave from those around them. When parents are noticeably concerned, children's anxiety levels rise. Parents should remain as calm as possible to be fully present for their children.
parents in the middle ages most likely did not eat there children but if they were dire enough the could have but most would chose not to eat there own children because like today parents love there children in most cases
They went with their parents. ____ Not necessarily. Some were sent on their own ... without their parents.
Host parents, regular parents, a place to stay, looked after.
The theme of "My Parents Kept Me from Children Who Were Rough" by Stephen Spender is the contrast between the sheltered, controlled upbringing of the speaker and the freedom and danger of interacting with rough children. It explores the idea of innocence versus experience, social class divisions, and the loss of childhood naivety.
it depends if you're child is sensitive or not but most of the time you should
Parents are completely responsible for their children's wellbeing, so it's parents to children.
Depends on the individual dog and the individual child. Very young children (6 and under) can be very rough on dogs or "tease" the dog. Westies ARE terriers and terriers will NOT put up with rough handling or teasing from children.(NO child should EVER be allowed to treat ANY dog like that ... but far too many parents have the attitude that dogs should somehow put up with that from children. Such parents should wait until the child is older to get a dog...or not get any dog at all.)
A family describes parents and children.
the parents have problem children
Children live by the example that their parents set. If their parents engage in bad behavior, their children will think this is how they are supposed to act.
Just a rough estimate but there are close to 45% to 65% or soldiers who are parents,
All children argue with their parents it is instinctual.
It basically means if children can get gifts from their parents.
Yes, parents are required to feed their children. It is considered child abuse to starve your children.
Educated parents can affect children a future because the future of children's depend upon parents life so if parents are educated ,socialized and civilized than they will also make these children educated ,socialized and civilized so educated parents affect children's future