It is based on equality which is a basic principle of democracy. It demands that the right to
vote should be equally available among all. To deny any class of persons from exercising
this right is to violate their right to equality. In fact, the spirit of democracy can be maintained
only if the people are given the right to vote without any discrimination. The exercise of
right to vote adds to the individual's self-respect, dignity, sense of responsibility, and political
and civic education. In other words, the system of adult franchise is the bedrock of a
democratic system. People are called political sovereign because they possess the right to
vote a government into power, or to vote a government out of power. That is why democracy
has sometimes been described as a mode of appointing, controlling and dismissing governments
by the people.
As provided for, in the Constitution of the land, the citizens cast their votes at regular
intervals to elect their representatives to the Parliament, to the Legislative Assemblies, and
such other institutions as are essential organs of political power in a democracy. These
institutions are called representative institutions precisely because they represent the will
Historically, adult franchise has been slow in making itself a universal law. In fact one of
the major demands in the long-drawn struggle for democracy in the world has been the
acceptance of the principle of universal adult franchise, as the basis of ascertaining the
wishes of people. Till the second decade of the twentieth century, not all the countries
were practising universal adult franchise. Many democratic systems had restricted to male
franchise only, based on property, education and other qualifications.
It is interesting to note that most of the western countries, which are known for their long
experience of some sort of representative system of governance, introduced adult franchise
only in the wake of the First World War (1914 - 18), a war which was proclaimed to be
fought by the Allied Powers (Great Britain, France and United States and the allies) to
make the 'world safe for democracy'. But while the 'defeated' Germany incorporated the principle of universal adult franchise in 1919, it took nine more years for Great Britain to Democracy at Work
extend franchise to women in 1928. In 1918, Britain had granted franchise to limited
number of women. It was decided that while all adult men, 21 years of age and above
would have the right to vote, women only above the age of 30 years could possess the
right to vote. This discrimination was removed only in 1928.
France, the land that gave the popular slogans of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, could
introduce the right of universal adult franchise to its people only after the end of the
Second World War i.e. 1945. Equally strange is the fact that Switzerland, the home of
direct democracy denied the right to vote to women till 1973. India adopted the principle of
universal adult franchise when the present Constitution was enacted in 1949 which as you
know was implemented on January 26, 1950.
Real Democracy not possible without Universal Adult Franchise
You cant have democracy without representation Unless every decision to do with the governing and governance of the country is settled by referendum.
no
no
Yes it's essential in a democracy; without consent there'd be no authority.
I think it's either Karl Malone, John Stockton or Reggie Miller.
First, define democracy. If you mean representing the wish of the majority of the people, then ALL people will need the franchise. There HAVE been "democracies" where the franchise was limited to adult land owning free males that were born there.
The existence of government and political parties implies that there is no true democracy (people deciding how to live and having real control over their lives).
It does not seem possible or probable that true democracy could be created in Central Asia without full scale violent revolutions.
People are elected by voters in a democracy and without an election there is no democracy.
Direct democracy is a democracy without representation, it was first practiced in ancient Athens.
The term quasi democracy means a system which has some resemblance to democracy without being actual democracy.
yes, it is meaningless
Egypt
Simply, No.
dialogue
wat
no