Chief Justice Warren didn't make an anonymous (meaning without revealing names) decision, the Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision (meaning they all agreed) in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).
The justices wanted to take a strong, united stance against segregation by issuing a single opinion signed by everyone. This sent a clear message to those who resisted desegregation that "separate but equal" was "inherently unequal" and would no longer be sanctioned by the Supreme Court.
The decision also opened the door to challenges of Jim Crow laws, and other discriminatory practices, with the expectation the Court would dismantle the institution of racism (or at least try).
Case Citation:
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
That separate but equal public education was unconstitutional.
The groundbreaking civil rights decision Brown v. Board of Education was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.
His appointment gave desegregation strong support
Answer this question… They wanted to present a united decision to the nation.
To present a united decision to the nation
That schools and students receive " equal protection of the laws"
That schools and students receive " equal protection of the laws"
That schools and students receive " equal protection of the laws"
That schools and students receive " equal protection of the laws"
The supreme court justice was Earl Warren.
After the Reynolds decision, voting districts had to be redrawn more fairlyAfter the Miranda decision, policemen had to read arrested people their rightsAfter the Brown's decision, desegregation in schools was started
He compares public education in his time to education in the 19th century