0
Why did the court ruled that Intelligent Design is not science?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Intelligent Design does not meet the basic requirements to be considered a science. It is not based on testable evidence or experiments. The court found that those who argued for Intelligent Design did not prove that ID meets these requirements.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A government is process by which a is ruled?
you are real smart and intelligent
Should Intelligent Design be taught in schools?
No, Intelligent Design (ID) should not be taught in schools, at least not public ones. Intelligent Design is not scientific fact. It could be taught in a comparative religion class along with other myths.Federal Courts have ruled that ID is not science but is simply the repackaged religious concept of creationism. Because of that, it cannot be legally taught in public schools.
How do you use word court in a sentence?
The court ruled in his favour.Romeo tried to court Juliet.The court was empty.
What court case ruled that evolution can be thought in schools?
The court case which ruled that evolution could be taught in schools was that of Edwards v. Aguillard.
How did the supreme court regarding the espionage?
The Court ruled that the Espionage Act was constitutional.
Have Federal courts have ruled that creations science is valid?
No
Plaintiff in a sentence?
The court ruled in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant had to pay court costs.
Which High Court of India ruled that Hindi is not the national language?
Gujarat High Court ,,
In 1896 did Jesse Jackson ruled in the supreme court?
No.
What has the Supreme Court ruled that districts be equal in?
Population.
How did the Supreme Court rule regarding the Espionage Act?
The Court ruled that the Espionage Act was constitutional.
What was the result of the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision?
The Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision in 1857 ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and had no right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and stated that the federal government could not regulate slavery in the territories.
