answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Well, America wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, but that plan was not very effectice. So the plan was to revise the Articles of Confederation, but they ended up changing it completely ( pretty much started over) and called it the Constition.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

"The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" were adopted by the 2nd Continental Congress on November 15th, 1777. They sought to combine the disparate colonies under a single governmental entity. They were the first attempt at a government for the United States, but were eventually replaced by the Constitution.

Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states and not enough to the central government. The central government wasn't able to pass laws or taxes if all the states did not approve. There was no president or federal judiciary. Essentially, the colonies could not operate effectively as a nation.

The articles of confederation was the first constitution of the United States but soon after its publication was perished because it was too weak.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The Articles of Confederation were to be changed because it was too weak. It lacked many powers, such as the right to tax and to create a standing army, that hindered efficiency.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

the Pennsylvania state house

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Shays Rebellion. Duhhh.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

because

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the main reason for the articles of confederation being revised?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Which document made confederation legal?

Confederation is defined as being the creation of loosely assembled states or territories. The Articles of Confederation made this act legal.


What accurately describes the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation are best characterized as a weak constitutional framework. Their existence led directly to the US Constitution being written, however.


What did the anti federalists think of the articles of confederation?

they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.


What plan of government created a weak federal government?

The Articles of Confederation created a very weak federal government. After being ruled by Britain for so long, the last thing the colonists wanted was a government that reflected a monarchy. The Articles of Confederation failed to give government many different powers, including the power to tax and the power to build an army. Many saw the problems associated with the Articles of Confederation through lack of revenue and the absence of a strong military to quash rebellions that were becoming common.


What were the delays in ratification for the Articles of Confederation?

Aside from the Revolutionary War being underway, the problem with the Articles was that they required unanimousratification, i.e. by all thirteen states. This was not accomplished until 1781.Most of the states did not agree with it unless they benefited from it, and they did not care how it affected the other states. Maryland especially wanted Virginia and New York to drop their claims to the Ohio Valley.

Related questions

Man who represented the US in France when the articles of confederation were being revised?

John Jay


What did they call the constitution when it was being ratified?

articles of confederation


Which document made confederation legal?

Confederation is defined as being the creation of loosely assembled states or territories. The Articles of Confederation made this act legal.


Are the articles of confederation still being used?

No they were abolished when the constitution was put into place.


What did the federalists think of the articles of confederation?

they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.


What accurately describes the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation are best characterized as a weak constitutional framework. Their existence led directly to the US Constitution being written, however.


What was the most pressing challenge facing the US during the Articles of Confederation period?

The most pressing was likely paying for the operations of the new government, there being no Federal power of taxation granted by the Articles of Confederation.


What did the anti federalists think of the articles of confederation?

they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.


Which weakness of the Articles of Confederation prevented US citizens from being equally represented?

One vote for each state


Why were the Articles of the Confederation created?

The Articles of Confederation were written in 1776 to establish a framework for the collaboration of the 13 American colonies that were fighting for their freedom from Britain, but was not passed until 1781. A unified government (the United States) was seen as preferable in limited respects. The Articles established powers that the national Congress was given by the states. The document was extremely weak in providing revenue, and could not control the conflicting authority of the separate states. The Articles of confederation was weak because of the people's experience from when they were being ruled by Britain.


What plan of government created a weak federal government?

The Articles of Confederation created a very weak federal government. After being ruled by Britain for so long, the last thing the colonists wanted was a government that reflected a monarchy. The Articles of Confederation failed to give government many different powers, including the power to tax and the power to build an army. Many saw the problems associated with the Articles of Confederation through lack of revenue and the absence of a strong military to quash rebellions that were becoming common.


Why were people against the original constitution?

If you mean the Articles of Confederation, then they weren't very good laws. One said that the bigger states pay less tax, because of all the people supposedly there. But, say they weren't. The smaller states were being treated unfairly. Then the people who wrote the Articles of Confederation saw their flaws and wrote the Constitution.