Because nuclear energy is the only viable means of producing large amounts of energy in the absence of fossil fuels. Yes, there are alternative sources of energy out there, but the technology is not ready for large scale operation. Nuclear is here now - Alternatives might be here in 30 to 50 years, or more. Yes, there are risks involved, but it is a matter of proper comparison of risk versus benefit and, when you objectively look at the big picture, without some of the fanaticism that we have on both sides of the coin, you discover that nuclear energy is better.
Obama Does not like solar energy and i have to agree with him its a waste of money and our time we should just stick with our fuel.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
I think it is pretty reliable these days, and safe, but many people do not agree that it is safe, and it is certainly expensive to build.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Yes, Obama has come out in favor of building new, safe, nuclear power plants.
Nuclear energy
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
agree
The energy released is nuclear energy.
Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors.
Nuclear energy is a faustian bargain. OR A faustian pact with nuclear energy. Even if you don't agree, the idea is that 'faustian' is an adjective typically describing a deal or pact (presumably with the devil or something associated with or compared to the devil).
Nuclear energy and renewable energy are not related. Renewable energy does not use nuclear energy.