Global warming may increase crop yields in some places, but it will seriously reduce crop yields in others.
Colder countries may be able to grow warmer climate crops. However, much of Africa will become too hot and dry for the traditional crops that people rely on for food.
If global warming continues, then even countries like Canada, which will be fruitful for a time, will then become too hot to be productive.
A: There are three things that crops need more than anything else to produce the best yields. Those three things are warmth, water, and carbon dioxide. Let us examine each of these in turn.
Warmth, obviously, is in more abundance during global warming. In many areas that are now too cold to grow crops, higher temperatures will make it possible, thus greatly increasing the acreage available for growing crops. Much of this area has never been cultivated, and therefore has not been subjected to the depletion of nutrients that traditional cropland has seen, so, with fertilizers, these soils will be more fertile than those in traditional crop-growing areas. Meanwhile, in the traditional crop-growing areas, temperatures are also going up (but, it must be noted, not as much as in colder latitudes). Temperatures will get warm earlier and cold later, extending the growing season, which means higher yields. There is, however, some concern that temperatures will get TOO warm in traditional crop-growing areas. While it is true that, beyond a certain maximum temperature (around 90oF for most crops) higher temperatures do not help crop growth and development, neither do these excessive temperatures, in and of themselves, retard crop growth and development. It is only when these excessive temperatures occur simultaneously with a lack of water that crops are harmed. (And as you will learn in the next paragraph, lack of water will not be an issue.) As long as there is plenty of water, temperatures could soar to 120oF and crops would continue to grow and develop at the fastest possible rate. Also, because temperatures get warm earlier, crops can be planted earlier to take advantage of warmer late-winter temperatures, and could be harvested before the hottest part of the year. It is even conceivable that, with a warmer spring and a warmer fall, farmers could get TWO crops each year on the same acreage. By the way, small grains like wheat, oats, barley, and rye, are often planted in the fall and harvested long before the hottest part of summer. Even if high temperatures were harmful to crops, there is no conceivable way they could harm these small grains. So, we could, if we had to, limit production of corn, soybeans, and other "summer" crops to cooler latitudes, and grow the small grains in the warmer latitudes, during the fall, winter, and spring.
Water will also be more abundant under global warming conditions. Higher temperatures will result in more evaporation of water from oceans and other bodies of water. This puts more water vapor into the atmosphere. This in turn means more rainfall. And rainfall benefits crops. There is some concern that global warming will force a shift in weather patterns, causing long-term drought in some areas that historically had plenty of rainfall. But it cannot be denied that, under global warming conditions, total precipitation across the entire planet will increase. So some traditional crop-growing areas will dry up. Fine. The soils there will have a chance to recover from centuries of overcultivation, and be ready to go when the warming trend ends. Meanwhile, the areas that will be, for the first time, receiving enough warmth and rain to grow crops will more than make up for the loss of acreage. OR we could build a system of canals to transport water from those areas that get too much rainfall to those areas that don't get enough. Expensive? Yes. But not nearly as expensive as the measures we will have to enact to stop global warming.
Carbon dioxide is to plants like oxygen is to us. Plants need it to survive, and the more of it they have, the faster they will grow. Growers of greenhouse plants often inject carbon dioxide into their greenhouses, up to 3 times the normal atmospheric concentration, to aid in growth and development, and the results are unequivocably positive. Lack of carbon dioxide has been shown, time and time again, to be the number-one limiting factor in crop yields. To my knowledge, no one has ever discovered a level of carbon dioxide that is "too high" for plants. Now, excess carbon dioxide is, supposedly, the cause of global warming. So, if global warming continues, it must be because of increased carbon dioxide. And increased carbon dioxide is good for crop yields.
However, all that said... even if global warming is occurring, even if it continues, and even if we are causing it by burning fossil fuels, there is absolutely no way that it can be bad for crops. In fact, I believe that global warming, if it continues, will be the best thing to happen to crop yields since the invention of the mechanical harvester, and will cause the amount of arable land to increase well over any level ever seen. Taking both effects into account, I suspect that potential food production will DOUBLE.
A: It is difficult to predict the future, but in 2001 the United Nations InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) issued a Report: Climate Change 2001: Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability(See the link below).
Here are some of the suggested impacts:
The answer to that is to stop global warming which unfortunately may not be possible. Do environmentally friendly things to help. Recycle, drive a fuel efficient car or hybrid, and don't use aerosols. Those are just a few of the ways to help the environment.
Fertilizing,increases crop yields.
Crop rotations increase crop yields by improving soil conditions and reducing weed and insect populations. Rotations also help producers use conservation tillage successfully. A well- planned crop-rotation system can help producers avoid many of the problems associated with conservation tillage, such as increased soil compaction, perennial weeds, plant diseases, and slow early season growth.
Without crop rotation, crop yields would drop rapidly over just a few years, and farmers would not be able to produce enough food, feed, fuel and fiber for us. Even if they could find ways to still keep yields up, it would greatly increase prices of all those things.
Because the growing of a crop removes vital plant foodstuffs from the soil and these must be replaced or subsequent crops will reduce in quality and quantity.
With global warming it is really just shifting the climates, so it will benefit some wile devaluing other land areas as far as the farming value is concerned.
Greater crop yields.
Yes. Predominantly yes as humanity has developed in our current stable climate, however small pockets of the world may benefit from increased crop yields some of the time such as the northern parts of Canada and Russia.
the major group of activities for improving crop yields can be classified as : .crop variety improvement .crop production improvement .crop protection management
Higher yields = increased income.
The plow increased crop yields and made soil more porous.
A yielder is someone or something which yields a crop, or which yields some other substance.
Crop rotation system developed in Britain during agricultural revolution increase crop yields by increasing nutrients in the soil.
Crop rotation system developed in Britain during agricultural revolution increase crop yields by increasing nutrients in the soil.
Crop rotation system developed in Britain during agricultural revolution increase crop yields by increasing nutrients in the soil.
Most people disagree with global warming, though the answer is obviously no. Global warming may increase plant and crop growing seasons, which affects people in a good way, but even that does show a sign of greater way of life since we already have an abundant amount of them (plants and crops). Global warming won' t make life as great since it can do many bad things such as letting out greenhouse gases.
Additional heat and lack of water will kill them. Farmers will have to find new crops or new croplands. Some areas that are now cold will become suitable for agriculture, but most of the present arable land will be in trouble.