Because a community can mean a lot of different things. A group of people that share the same values can be called a community, but so can a bunch of people that live in the same geographical area.
There are many types of communication; physical, non-verbal, verbal, systematic, biological, and more. One needs to know which general area you are interested in.
does not accurately describe communication
Reaction against
Intrapersonal communication is language or thought that is internal to the communicator.It can be useful to envision intrapersonal communication taking place in the mind of the person.
Communicative functions are the purpose of communication. The functions define what you hope to accomplish through communication, and the varying types of communication used to accomplish that.
Define processes on either end of communication. Define the types of messages. Define the syntax of messages. Define the meaning of any informational fields. Define how the messages are sent and the expected response. Define interaction with the next lower layer.
communication by word of mouth.
identify and define the elements of the communication process
instructional communication
define downword
does not accurately describe communication
Transfer of Information There must be a sender and a receiver for communication to occur.
What are the processes, types and functions of health communication
The term
define difficult
no
define commmunication of police
The question assumes that it is difficult to define philosophy. That's not necessarily true.Etymologically, a "philosopher" is a "lover of wisdom." In other words, a philosopher is someone seriously trying to become wise. That's not difficult to understand.If the concept of wisdom were difficult to define, then it would be difficult to define the goal of philosophy. If the concept of wisdom were not difficult to define, then it would not be difficult to define the goal of philosophy.Whether or not wisdom is difficult to define depends upon the nature of wisdom, which is controversial. Anyone who is serious about the nature of wisdom needs to articulate what he or she thinks is a sound argument concerning its nature. Whatever argument is advanced, it will be attacked to see if it stands up to examination.Therefore, it may or may not be difficult to define the nature of philosophy, because doing so depends upon understanding the nature of wisdom. If wisdom is simple, as it may be, then so will be the definition of philosophy. If it is not the case that wisdom is simple, then neither will be the definition of philosophy.In short, the nature of philosophy is itself controversial. That itself may be sufficient for it to be classified as difficult to define. ----