0
Why is a scientific inquiry a process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Elza Olson
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
Scientific inquiry is a process with many paths
Why is scientific inquiry a process with paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific inquiry process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why scientific inquiry a process with many path not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of paths?
The short answer is that a rigid process for inquiry is the scientific equivalent of dogma, encoding a bias that implies an inequality of hypotheses (and people) that is contradictory to the scientific method. This results not in standardization and improved trust, but in eroding trust and periodic fragmentation. We do actually already have such constraints on the inquiry process in the form of funding, religious, moral and legal constraints, which are completely appropriate given that Science is intentionally rational, apathetic towards emotion, and amoral. However even though we do have these constraints, and because we don't have a common base for religion, morality, or legality, they already have since the beginning been causing the fragmentation spoken of above; the more rigid and detached from the consumers of the science the constraints on inquiry become, the faster and more antagonistic the fragmenting gets. There's a lot more detail, these are the essentials.
Can scientific inquiry be a process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
Science has always been a flexible multipath process. Scientific discoveries quite frequently happen when least expected and not being looked for. Serendipity is essential to progress in the field of science and getting stuck on a fixed sequence usually blinds the observer from making such discoveries. Many new discoveries were overlooked by scientists that were overly rigid and the results discarded, only to be rediscovered later by other scientists not so blindered by their formal procedures and rigid expectations. Whatever gave you the idea that science is rigid and inflexible?
Which property will you use to process different server paths in a page?
Server
What is scientific method of inquiry?
The Scientific Method and InquiryThe basic definition of the Scientific Method includes these steps:observation and description of a phenomenonformulation of a hypothesis to explain the phenomenause of the hypothesis to predict existence of other phenomenaperformance of experimental tests of the prediction and inferring a conclusionsome include a fifth step of presenting, debating and/or application of findingsQuestioningThe inquiry process gives heavy emphasis to development of questions at each step. What questions come from observation?What questions are relevant to the hypothesis?What questions formulate the prediction?What questions are answered from the test of the prediction and what questions, new and old, remain unanswered in part or in full?The process of Information Inquiry involves application of the ancient Socratic Method of teaching through self-posed and mentor-posed questions in order to gain meaning in today's overwhelming Information Age. Further application of the Scientific Method gives a systematic structure to this process. It places students and teachers in the role of Information Scientists. This analogy will be explored as one that may open new paths for students and teachers to investigate not only phenomenon identified from typical subjects of study, but to also test and predict the value, relevance and meaning of information itself. As "information scientists" should the learner be expected to journal, debate, compare, and present his or her observations on the value of the information encountered and the need for information that may not be available or possible to obtain?
Which pair of ideas were central to scientific revolution?
Rate of change AND elliptical orbital paths; nee Newton & Copernicus.
What is the process by which small streams erode their forward paths through rock is called?
headward erosion
