Arguments against smoking

Answer 1

You will most likely die sooner and we have a better chance of guessing what you will die from.

Nicotine has some good effects I guess, but use a patch or pill, cancer and lung diseases are not very fun, plus it makes you smell like poo. It also helps have black teeth and makes you look pale

Answer 2

bad things are it can effect a baby's Birth Rate..>>:( cause lung cancer, respiratory problems etc..basically it just damages your whole body and really has no purpose of being invented lol like triston Paine

Answer 3

just go back to Google i dont no

Answer

Smoking is linked to many diseases and conditions such as lung cancer (and other cancers), emphysema and heart conditions. The risk of disease and death is the best argument against smoking. Also, even if one knows one is to die, one may not be able to save oneself (since nicotine is extremely addictive and the one that needs saving may easily have become highly addicted), which is terrible for a living organism and should be against their better natures. Some may note the expense of cigarettes. This point is irrelevant, even to the highly impecunious, against the shadow of the first argument, that organisms must avoid death and sickness (and even risk thereof) to stay healthy. Some may think that smoking is a way to fit in with peers. This is extremely surprising. It seems against all common sense, no matter how many peers or friends indulge in the activity, the most important thing in life is surely to live and shun all that holds back or breaks down absolute health and thus, against all peer expectations perhaps if the peers have not thought it through, one should shun smoking and never indulge in it oneself. Indeed, given the intelligence of Homo sapiens, even peer-pressured humans: given the intelligence of humans and the knowledge that smoking may bring sickness or death, one would expect humans to avoid it, shun it, ban it, at the very least not go near it. Humans are living organisms and it is surely aberrant and perverse of them to damage their absolute health. One would not jump off a bridge without a rope or leap out of an aeroplane. Yes, smoking takes longer to kill you (normally), but so what? Humans should protect themselves, and their fellows (from side-stream inhalation) against all danger to health. They should want their health to be the best it possibly can at 16, 26, 36, 56 and indeed, 86, if they live so long. And they should protect the health of all others too. And, most importantly, they should respect their brain's knowledge, against peer-pressured surroundings if they exist, of how to protect oneself. The brain, if educated properly, should say 'leaving smoking well alone'.

Answer 4

you know, i think a better way to phrase this question would be "Arguments for smoking" b/c absolutely every single thing about smoking is bad, it has never done any good for anyone anywhere at any time, not only does it cause health problems for everyone around you but has been linked to SIDS; it's pretty bad something scientifically proven to be horrible to everyone's health including the unborn is still readily accepted and practiced around the world

Answer 5

The most important reasons not to smoke are the facts that: it is hard to stop, lung cancer, throat cancer, mouth cancer, tar in lungs, high levels of toxins in your body, yellow fingers and nails, bad breath, bad smell and it is extremely expensive.

Answer 6

Because it could harm you in many ways and it can also kill you.

Answer 7

The biggest reason is that you'll get lung and/or mouth cancer from inhaling the smoke. But cigarettes also have a bunch of nasty chemicals like ammonia (a cleaning product) and rocket fuel.