answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Being refused a lawyer by the state of Florida..... apex... makes no sense to me but its right apparently

User Avatar

Jerald Orn

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Caleb Tlaczani

Lvl 1
12mo ago
Corr
User Avatar

Caleb Tlaczani

Lvl 1
12mo ago
Cor
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)

Clarence Earl Gideon is the dude in Florida who was accused of breaking and entering in 1961 who was deinied an attorney. After 2 years in prison, he appealed to the supreme court and the supreme court reversed Betts vs. Brady, and Gideon is the reason why we have a public defender system...

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Gideon was arrested on charges of breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny, a felony.

Case Citation:

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)

For more information, see Related Links, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)

Clarence Earl Gideon served two years of a five year sentence for the original 1961 conviction of "breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny," a felony in the state of Florida.

If five years was the maximum penalty for his crime under Florida's sentencing guidelines at that time, he probably received a longer sentence due to being a habitual criminal. Gideon had spent most of the previous three decades in and out of Texas and Missouri state prisons on charges of burglary, stealing, larceny, petty theft and escape. He had also been incarcerated in federal prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, for stealing unspecified government property.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

DADE ALLEN

Lvl 6
2y ago

Being refused a lawyer by the state of florida..... apex... makes no sense to me but its right apparently

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Prior to the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, why was Clarence Gideon in jail?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What supreme court case incorporated the right to a speedy trial?

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)


What was the outcome of the case of Gideon vs Wainwright?

Gideon vs. Wainwright is a US Supreme Court Case from 1963. The vote was unanimous. This court case decided under the fourth amendment, state courts are required to provide an attorney in criminal cases when the defendant cannot afford one.


What principle was established by the 1963 Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright?

Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.


Clarence Thomas was what number of the Supreme Court?

Justice Clarence Thomas was the 106th justice to sit on the US Supreme Court.


How long was each sentence served by Clarence Earl Gideon the Appellee of Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Clarence Earl Gideon served two years of a five year sentence for the original 1961 conviction of "breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny," a felony in the state of Florida. Gideon entered prison in August 1961 and was released in August 1963 after the US Supreme Court remanded the case for rehearing. The second jury deliberated only an hour before acquitting Gideon in his second trial.Gideon was a petty criminal who had spent most of the previous three decades in and out of Texas and Missouri state prisons on charges of burglary, stealing, larceny, petty theft and escape. He had also been incarcerated in federal prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, for stealing unspecified government property.For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Related questions

How old was Clarence Earl Gideon in 1963?

Clarence Earl Gideon was born 1910, and was 52 years old when the US Supreme Court released its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 355 (1963). He turned 53 years old in August of that year.


Who is the defendant of Gideon v Wainwright?

Clarence E.Gideon is the appellant (as this was a Supreme Court appeal) and Louie L. Wainright is the defendant (representing the Secretary of the Florida Dept. of Corrections).


In Gideon v. Wainwright the Supreme Court ruled that a defendant in a state court had the right to?

The right to a lawyer.


What supreme court decisions expand the protections of assistance of counsel?

Gideon v Wainwright


What group benefited from Gideon v Wainwright?

The Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) ensured indigent criminal defendants had access to a court-appoint attorney.


What was the outcome of Clarence Earl Gideon's second trial?

Gideon was acquitted at his second trial.In Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963), the US Supreme Court vacated the judgment in Clarence Earl Gideon's original trial and remanded he case for a new trial. Gideon was represented by attorney W. Fred Turner at his second trial, State of Florida v. Clarence Earl Gideon, and was acquitted after a brief jury deliberation.


What supreme court case incorporated the right to a speedy trial?

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)


At Gideon's original trial who was the lawyer?

In Gideon's first trial, State of Florida v. Clarence Earl Gideon, he was forced to defend himself (pro se) because the Supreme Court ruled in Betts v. Brady, (1942) that the states didn't have to provide court-appointed counsel to indigent criminal defendants. The Supreme Court overturned this decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963).Gideon's attorney in the Supreme Court case was future justice Abe Fortas; his attorney at his second trial was Fred W. Turner.


What US supreme court case established the right to counsel for indigent defendants in federal court proceedings?

Gideon v. Wainwright


What is the citation for Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)The case was originally called Gideon v. Cochran, but Louie L. Wainwright succeeded Cochran as Secretary to the Florida Department of Corrections before the case was heard in the US Supreme Court.


What was a social impact of the gideon v wainwright case?

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that if a defendant cannot afford a lawyer, one must be provided to him or her regardless of the defendant's ability to pay or the importance of the charges.


Who lost the case Gideon or Wainright?

Gideon was the man denied the aid of an attorney at his trial, He sued, seeking the right to be provided with an attorney. The Supreme Court decided in his favor. Gideon won, Wainwright lost.