The peasants were unhappy because they lacked food to eat, and to survive. Also King Louis IVV forced them to pay taxes. The King did nothing to stop the local aristocrat's animals wandering all over their land eating the crops. They worked at farms for nothing, the amount of money they get paid was little or nothing while the aristocrats had plenty.
It sort of can be compared to the way things are going now with gas prices, sooner or later the "peasants" will get tired of being gouged by the oil companies and bring them down.
And... not to mention... the peasants were at the bottom of the social class. they didnt have many rights, so they couldn't get different or better jobs.
They were angry because the peasants had to pay taxes and other richer people didn't have to at all. This was inequality and they wanted justice for everybody. They had to do chores and the Estates-General didn't come very often and they wanted him to come at least once every three years. The French were also upset about the complete monarchy in the country. Which meant that there was no government, the King just made all the decisions. They received low wages and along with the heavy taxes this led to poverty, which was unfair.
I think the 'kick start' for the French Revolution was expensive wars abroad, no money for the peasants and them having to eat rotten food because all food was going to the Army.
The expression "let them eat cake" attributed to Marie Antoinette is as a result of an old french law - that if a baker ran out of bread, he would have to sell cake at the same price.
The peasents were angry because they were treated badly.
I guess it's because they thought the revolution wasn't extreme enough. there were still 'enemies' of the revolution and they had to be gotten rid of. So came the reign of terror.
The French peasants were dissatisfied with their life during this period of French history, because they were given the least amount of rights due to their social class.
they wanted to get married and have love to the king.
The peasants were poor during the French Revolution because at that time wages were being cut and prices on bread were going up, while Louis XVI were living a life of extravagance
because they were afraid to be killed
curry
The Colonists won their independence from Great Britain.
Technology developed during the Industrial Revolution allowed for the mass production of goods such as textiles" is the best option. The Industrial Revolution changed the course of economic history.
It was King Chulalongkornuntil his death in 1910, and then his sons ruled, solitarily of course, until the Siamese Revolution in 1932.
About one third or 1/3
The definition of revolution is to throw over a current government and replace it with a new one. A revolution is usally ignited if the governed feel a lack of freedom or a violation of their human rights. In the American revolution though, economics, I think, was the biggest factor. The American Revolution only started because of actions by Great Britain like the Stamp Act or Tea Tax. The colonists of course dissagreed with this ("No Taxation without Representation"). That is why the American Revolution was ignited. Otherwise, if England would not have been so focused on making the best profit themselves (the idea mercantalism plays a major role here too), the colonists would have been happy and satisfied with the way it was.
same thing im looking for
Of course they did.
Of course you do.
the Mexicans of course. then the texans rebelled hence the texas revolution.
Of course ...
The college Graduate Tutor should be consulted about how to approach unresolved problems on the course. If, after consulting the Course supervisor, the matter is not resolved to the student's satisfaction, or if the student is dissatisfied with the support available from these persons.
Most medieval peasants were poor. In fact, most were serfs, who could not own land and were not allowed to move away from the manors on which they lived. A few peasants were independent farmers who held their own land, and some of these were referred to by contemporary writers as wealthy. They were, of course only wealthy relative to other peasants, and had very little wealth compared to the lords.
The source of the discontent was to be found in the Catholic church instead of in the cane fields. It was directed from the pulpit which gave it a moral underpinning that the Spanish government had a hard time dealing with.
the scientific revolution was believed to change history of course and people socially and intellectually
of course the workers who made this or the government :P its me youbin but not the author of answers....
Slavery wasn't even much of a problem then. Peasants were his slaves you can say... and of course he had no problem with that.
Some machines had a negative affect on the lives of workers. More machinery meant less was done by hand which meant that less workers were needed. Of course machinery also made some jobs easier for workers.