Ghost exists but at that time the belief was stronger than now. More unknowns mean you have a more difficult time explaining why things happen. We don't like leaving things unknown, so perhaps people in the 19th century were more inclined to accept a supernatural explanation because they didn't have the understanding for a perfectly logical explanation. That or the Ghostbusters really cleaned up in the 80s.
meat, salt, and produce
History Book
They would probably go on wagons to a general store to buy some medicine.
Yes, they did. If it was not for hunting we more than likely would not be here. Meat is what our ancestors lived on.
If you think there are ghosts in your house then call them.....but i would go to a therpy and ask if you have ghosts in you house..........it works....i've tried it well i hear that ghosts busters get rid of ghosts,so i guess if you think you have a ghost in your house maybe they could help.
29% would believe in ghosts. 71% wouldn't believe in ghosts.
Some people believe in ghosts, and that would make it more likely that you would see one. Most people don't believe and don't see them. I have a friend that lost her son due to a tragedy, and she saw him multiple times in the weeks after his death. I don't believe in ghosts, but I believe she saw him.
Generally no, since most people don't believe in ghosts. But if there were ghosts, they would have to be poltergeists to do this. Most alleged ghosts don't manipulate objects.
It depends on the specific spiritual beliefs of that person. Many people do not believe in ghosts and therefore would have no effect.
A lot of people are, while most people just don't know what to feel so they improvise and feel scared. Some people do not even believe in ghosts and, if/when they DID see a ghost, they would think it was a practical joke...
Atheists can believe whatever they want about any subject (except the existence of gods). Atheism does not have any sort of dogma and therefore atheists do not have to agree on any other issue. But most atheists who would also identify as a skeptic (The new atheism Richard Dawkins camp) would not believe in ghosts.
lol ghosts are not real. ppl just like to fool others and they feed more and more ppl with'evidence' and now people would believe anything
Assuming that you believe that ghosts exist, it would be logical to think that a ghost who had believed a cross would repel ghosts in life would believe this in its afterlife and therefore be repelled. However, if the ghost did not have any such associations with crosses in life, why would it fear a cross in the afterlife?
No, a ghost can't kill you, ghosts would have to exist in the first place.
There is no scientific evidence that ghosts are real. However there are many people that believe such entities do exist. It would depend on who you ask and which particular 'ritual' they prefer. Conjuring up spirits has long been the province of charlatans and conmen.
People who believe in ghosts would say that you have to have a murder or suicide in the school for a ghost - if something horrible has happened at a school, there's always the chance that there might be a ghost. You'd have to do some history research and find that out.
yes, though most people dont belive.There is no conclusive evidence that ghost or vampires exist although some people would like to believe that they do.