Marines would maybe say yes. There were 760,000 men who served in the Marine Corps during WWII. The Marines ultimately put six divisions, all infantry, into combat. There were over eight million men in the US Army, and the Army had ninety-one divisions, including sixty-five infantry, sixteen armored, six airborne, two cavalry and one mountain division. Additionally the army had thousands of non-divisional "independent" combat battalions, such as tank, tank destroyer, artillery of various calibers, and engineer battalions. All six Marine Divisions served in the Pacific, but so did fifteen or so Army divisions, plus three entire US Army Air Forces. There were three US Army field armies in the Pacific. All this while the US Army was defeating Germany, Italy and the minor Axis partners with no assistance from the Marine Corps. This is not to belittle the hard service of the Marines, but you do the math.
The Pacific theater stopped the Japanes empire from ruling the whole Pacific Ocean. It also gave America a sort of controll of some captured Pacific areas that would lead to more war and bloodshed (Korea and Veitnam wars). Plus it put the United States as a world power in the new Atomic Age.
It depends on the number of Marines. The rifle belonging to a Marine would the Marine's rifle. If you are talking about multiple Marines it would be Semper Fi is the Marines' unofficial motto.
No, not as ground forces, although they did serve in France during World War 1. US Navy battleships and cruisers in the European Theater during World War 2 would have typically carried a small number of US Marines.
During World War II, there were several island-battles in which 4,000 or more U.S. Marines would be killed. Earlier in the war, during the Guadalcanal Campaign, over 4,000 Marines were killed, while later in the war, in the Allied reconquest of the Philippines, roughly the same number would be lost in action.
True
Pacific
Lima
They fought an extremely bloody war (1941-1945) in the Pacific Ocean. This contributor is of the belief that if Hitler and Mussolini had never been born, the US and Japan would still have fought a war for supremacy in the Pacific.
Midway is an important battle between the Japanese and America. It was the turning point in the pacific where the Americans would push back the Japanese.
The Pacific Ocean.
To the East Coast, the Atlantic, to the West Coast, the Pacific.
The Pacific would be the only direct route.
I would believe at least 2 days after Japan surrendered because technology could not connect from the pacific islands to America \
The Pacific theater stopped the Japanes empire from ruling the whole Pacific Ocean. It also gave America a sort of controll of some captured Pacific areas that would lead to more war and bloodshed (Korea and Veitnam wars). Plus it put the United States as a world power in the new Atomic Age.
that would be South America
Assuming the question was meant to be worded as follows: What continent can you not be found on if you are facing east and the pacific ocean is in front of you: Asia, Australia, or South America? The answer is South America. If on South America, and facing east, you would be facing toward the Atlantic Ocean. On the other hand, if on Asia or Australia and facing east, you would be facing toward the Pacific Ocean.
In the world? That's an opinion I've heard and some would argue Royal Marines In Asia Opinions are probably different. But America doesn't lose and that makes them THEE finest military branches on the planet.