There are numerous more specific and detailed predictions that follow logically from evolutionary theory, and that could, if observations were found to be inconsistent with them, lead to the falsification of evolutionary theory.
Scientist already have proven Charles Darwin wrong with the use of DNA testings showing that we do not have a link to neanderthals etc. CD also states himself not to take his writings as fact for they are not a finished product and a lot of studies are needed to be done. but it does not prove evolution as a whole wrong for their are many different types of evolution theories that have abundant amounts of evidence to hold. CD was the stepping stone for evolution that helped expand science as we know it.
-Very well said.
There ARE many different types of evolution. Just because one may be disproven doesnt mean the rest have to be.
anyways all science means is=KNOWLEDGE
- Indeed.
Plus it is already know that Homo Sapiens are not descendants of Neanderthals, but of Homo Erectus. Neanderthals are a sister species to Homo Sapiens. so CD's theory is still not proven wrong seeing as he never implies that we are descendants from Neanderthals.
Darwin's theory of natural selection has been proven in many ways. For example, many years ago in what is now the United Kingdom there was a coal factory that exploded. The city was covered in soot for quite some time. Now, during that time there was a species of yellow butterfly that quickly began going extinct because of how much they stood out on the now black city surfaces (an easy target for their predators). Because of this, a new species that had been formed due to genetic mutations in the line of butterflies became more and more common simply because their genetics had naturally changed, turning them a blackened color. Since this species with a more blackened color could blend more to its surroundings, it stood a much better chance of surviving versus the yellow butterflies, and thus they began to thrive.
There's still debate on it. It's accepted in the same vain as the Big Band. There's no concrete proof but it's a popular theory.
Continuously, by thousands upon thousands of researchers, ever since it was first conceived by Charles Darwin.
well the thing is u cnt
Science has no capacity to completely prove something... However these are some facts that make it likely to be true. - An extensive fossil record which completely conforms to predictions. - Observing evolution in action (such as the flu virus changing ever year, the HIV virus changing all the time, speciation in plants and animals in non-lab environments, lab experiments etc). - Paternity testing (the techniques used in paternity testing are also used to demonstrate how closely related different species are). - DNA (all organisms use the exact same code for proteins) - similarities in phylogeny (why do we share so many features with other organisms?) - similarities in DNA conform to the predictions made by evolution
I think science can prove it. Because, thanks to evolution birds evolved from dinosaurs. Obviously these were very basic birds of course but then came the more complex, sub species of birds. The hen did come first, as it took millions of years of evolution to create it. And though many may disagree and say that you need an egg to create a hen, well in this case.. Evolution created the hen, which will then create the egg.
They are against it because it goes against their beliefs, so they try to prove it wrong but only end up losing.
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
No, since there were no hominid skulls found during his lifetime. What most people refer to as the faked missing link skull is the Piltdown man: Found in a gravel pit in Sussex England in 1912.
5 prove about the animals
to prove evolution
sorry, you cannot prove that something is true if it is not true!
used to prove the analogous homologous characteristics of evolution
Evolution
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
Evolution is not incorrect. Science believes that creatioism is wrong.
Because although there is evidence to support the claims, it isn't possible to prove evolution indefinately.
Yes. However, it is possible to PROVE the validity of evolution on an evidential basis.
Because the horse did NOT evolve, people just made evolution up. There are many things to prove evolution is fake.
Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence. The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory. PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.