This question has been haunting linguists, psychologists and neuroscientists for decades now. The famous linguist Noam Chomsky first put forward that language is an innate capacity of the human brain, and that it is an autonomous faculty - meaning that it is a system of its own, rather than one of the manifestations of intelligence. Chomsky reckoned language to be something 'special' and uniquely human: no species has an equivalent of language. Certainly, they have systems of communication, but they all lack a several important features, such as recursion (sentences within sentences), creativity and dissociation between the signifier (communication element, a word or sign) and the signified. As an example of the last aspect: there is no relationship between the word 'tree' (or, in other human languages: boom, arbre, etc...) has no relationship whatsoever to the tangible real-world tree. Chomsky's ideas caused quite some controversy in the field of linguistics: some said that the fact that language does not exist in animals was due to the fact that they are simply not as smart as humans. Still, some experts think that language is no specialized capacity. Conversely, Fodor continued the line of Chomsky's thought, stating that language is a 'module' in the brain that does not interact with other parts of it. He supports this claim with extensive evidence: for example, there is a big difference in the reaction of people to acoustic signals that are supposed to be an utterance, and acoustic signals that are non-linguistic. This means that language is processed in a different way - by different, specialized parts, suggests Fodor - than other input. Another strong piece of evidence for the view that language is not a projection of intelligence, is provided by individuals with Specific Language Impairment on the one hand, and people suffering from Williams Syndrome on the other hand. In the first case, patients have a normal intelligence, but they perform far below average on language tasks. Williams syndrome is a genetic disorder in which the patient has a very low IQ, but a normal or near-normal language performance. This 'double dissociation' may indicate that language is indeed not so closely related to intelligence. It remains difficult to formulate relationships between language ability and intelligence accurately. A problem that rises when one tries to compare the two, is that widely used IQ tests (such as the WISC and the WAIS) necessarily include verbal tests. Personally, I do believe that intelligence both consitutes a threshold for language: no cases of individuals with a mental age below 5, the age at which children have acquired a great deal of the grammar of their native language, being able to master grammatic rules, are known. Also, I believe that language does rely on other broader cognitive systems such as memory. Therefore, language and intelligence can never be considered to be completely separate.
Stingrays are known to have a higher level of intelligence than their related family of sharks. The level of intelligence is yet to be determined but they have been known to respond to subtle food signals. They also tend to be more docile creatures and avoid attacking humans if its not necessary....... yup
No, according to A Manual of the Hindustani Language, the answer is "kutta" which is similar to the other languages of the region like Urdu and Hindi.From: A manual of the Hindustani language: as spoken in southern India"Published 1887 by Higganbotham & Co.See the related link.
The question is worded in a way that does not make much sense. There are, in fact, animals with NO intelligence. For example, a sponge is technically an animal, although they completely lack brains, and nerves for that matter. A more reasonable question might be "which vertebrate has the least intelligence," because all vertebrates have a measurable intelligence. You can't really figure out how much an insect can learn on its own.
It you mean lacking in intelligence, then they are not dumb, they have intelligence according to their local needs. If you mean refraining from any or much speech, then Yaks 'grunt'
Owl
The eight skills of related intelligence are linguistic intelligence, logical-mathematical intelligence, spatial intelligence, musical intelligence, bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, and naturalistic intelligence. These skills reflect an individual's abilities in various areas such as language, reasoning, creativity, and understanding oneself and others.
the role of intelligence the second language learning
it had no ablility to create taxes and govern a country. i think im not sure that's my guess. :)
General intelligence help student to understand the new language
Abilify.
Intelligence in love is, but not school-related.
YES, if you mean is there intelligence behind the language. As all languages that science has observed has intelligence involved we assume that DNA especially, as it is so complex, also is from intelligence
There are many services that are related to the Business Intelligence Implementation. Examples of the types of services that are related to the Business Intelligence Implementation includes data mining and online analytical processing.
The major computer language is lisp and prolog.
TensorFlow
Innate! You are born with the ablility to suckle
Its ablility to separate solutes.