Want this question answered?
Yes, but only those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
Missouri itself - and after that, any of the other territories acquired by the Louisiana Purchase that were South of Missouri's Southern border, that was 36, 30.
The Missouri Compromise only affected those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. After the Mexican War, the vast new territories like California did not fall under the provisions of the Compromise.
it was Jonh jackson
The Missouri Compromise addressed slavery in the Arkansas and unorganized territory of the Great Plains. Slavery was prohibited in all of these areas, except within the boundaries of Missouri.
all the rest of the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern border of Missouri.
The assurance that there would be no new slave-states North of the Missouri line.
No new slave-states North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border. But this only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase. After the Mexican War, a new compromise had to be worked out.
The Kansas Nebraska Act reopened argument over the spread of slavery into territories of the Louisiana Purchase.
The revolt against their mother country, England, the Louisiana Purchase, and the exploration of unclaimed western territories beyond the boundaries of the Louisiana Purchase.
Missouri
(the Louisiana Purchase)