Want this question answered?
There is no such thing as neoclassical macroeconomics, only new classical macroeconomics. Neoclassical economics is a dominant school of microeconomics which relies on the use of supply and demand models in order to determine prices, outputs and income distributions and bases its models on utility maximization by individuals with limited income and profit maximization by firms with limited resources (i.e. costs) using production factors. Neoclassical economics developed. Developed at the beginning of the 20th century in the wake of the Marginal Revolution, it is - together with neo-Keynesian macroeconomics - one of the two components of the neoclassical synthesis. As neo-Keynesian macroeconomics failed to provide satisfying solutions to several economic crises in the 1970s new classical economics emerged along with monetarism/Chicago school of economics as new macroeconomic schools of thought. New classical macroeconomics derive their theories on the macroeconomic level from microfoundations based on neoclassical theory. It is therein rivaled by New Keynesian macroeconomics which aims to provide Keynesian macroeconomics with microfoundations of its own.
the classical believe the economy is best left to itself whereas the keynesian argued that government intervention could improve economic performance
New Keynesians account for time in their models
Keynesian economics.
mr gwilem Jones infented school
There is no such thing as neoclassical macroeconomics, only new classical macroeconomics. Neoclassical economics is a dominant school of microeconomics which relies on the use of supply and demand models in order to determine prices, outputs and income distributions and bases its models on utility maximization by individuals with limited income and profit maximization by firms with limited resources (i.e. costs) using production factors. Neoclassical economics developed. Developed at the beginning of the 20th century in the wake of the Marginal Revolution, it is - together with neo-Keynesian macroeconomics - one of the two components of the neoclassical synthesis. As neo-Keynesian macroeconomics failed to provide satisfying solutions to several economic crises in the 1970s new classical economics emerged along with monetarism/Chicago school of economics as new macroeconomic schools of thought. New classical macroeconomics derive their theories on the macroeconomic level from microfoundations based on neoclassical theory. It is therein rivaled by New Keynesian macroeconomics which aims to provide Keynesian macroeconomics with microfoundations of its own.
the classical believe the economy is best left to itself whereas the keynesian argued that government intervention could improve economic performance
Keynesians say that government should interven in economic activities where as classical say not too
I. V. Filatochev has written: 'Kontseptsii \\' -- subject(s): Macroeconomics, International economic relations, Neoclassical school of economics, Keynesian economics, Capitalism
G. R. Steele has written: 'Keynes and Hayek' 'Monetarism and the demise of Keynesian economics' -- subject(s): Chicago school of economics, Classical school of economics, Keynesian economics, Quantity theory of money
Peter K. Fleissner has written: 'The nuel' 'Stability in neo-classical and neo-Keynesian growth models' -- subject(s): Economic development, Keynesian economics, Mathematical models, Neoclassical school of economics
New Keynesians account for time in their models
== == == == the difference betwen Neo-classical and classical school is that: 1-CLASSICAL SCHOOL:-It is related to wealth and introduced by Adam Smith an economist of classical school. 2-NEO-CLASSICAL:-It is related to human welfare. Marshall, an economist, described that "Economics is a science of human welfare" and we call it the neo-classical view that is known as neo-classical school
Keynesian economics.
Classical High School was created in 1843.
Alexander Classical School was created in 1837.
mr gwilem Jones infented school