The main draw of Bernie Sanders is his authenticity and political consistency. Donald Trump says the first thing on his mind without any deliberation, resulting in him having taken every possible position on every issue (like the abortion question in mid-April 2016). Hillary Clinton is less volatile and more methodical in deciding her political stances, but she too functions more as a bellwether than a politician motivated by convictions. Bernie Sanders has held the same opinions for forty years, showing ideological consistency, which should be prized in a leader.
The biggest thing that people can do is to focus on the candidate's issues and their records. Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are skilled at appealing to voters by saying particular things, but then may say completely opposite things another day to different voters.
1. Find out what issues the supporters are passionate about and care most about it.
2. Find out the record and positions of all 3 candidates on that particular issue and tell them about it.
First of all, the superdelegates are a phenomenon exclusively in the Democratic Party, so they cannot vote for Donald Trump at all. Second, the superdelegates generally vote in accordance with the way that the people vote in the primaries, so if more Bernie Sanders supporters vote and tip the delegate count away from Hillary Clinton, most superdelegates will follow suit.
As of March 2016, it is clear that Bernie Sanders is not effectively courting the Black and Latino communities. In order to be victorious, he would have to embrace the kind of race-baiting that Hillary Clinton engages in, in order to bring these groups on his side. Ultimately the last few primaries that he lost were lost on account of the Black vote.
Sir Edmund Hillary Collegiate's motto is 'Towards Far Horizons'.
It is impossible to know how Hillary Clinton actually intends to assemble her cabinet. However, there are two reasons to be dubious that Clinton would appoint Bernie Sanders to the position of Secretary of State, should she win the election in November 2016.Primarily, Hillary showed with her nomination of Tim Kaine to the vice presidential position that she intends to govern as a centrist Democrat or a conservative Democrat. She seems rather disinterested in making a strong pivot to the progressive Democratic platform. It may be that this is a ploy to attract conservatives who are wary of Trump, who would be more willing to endorse a more conservative Democrat instead of a reality television candidate, and would get Hillary the necessary votes to win the Presidency before becoming more progressive. However, Hillary has consistently been a centrist or conservative in her political career and was pulled towards a more progressive platform in order to capture more Democrats in the primary period. It is unlikely that a shift towards the progressive platform is what she truly desires.Secondarily, the Secretary of State position in particular is a horrible match with Bernie Sanders's experience and interests. The Secretary of State position is the equivalent position in most foreign countries of the foreign minister and is responsible for coordinating US responses to foreign relations matters and issues. If there is any political issue that Bernie Sanders could not care less about, it is foreign policy. He is very interested in universal healthcare, decreasing costs of education, opposing trade deals, supporting labor unions, and a number of other domestic policies. Bernie Sanders would be a much better fit, should Clinton choose to bring him on, for positions like: the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Education, the Secretary of Labor, etc., but not Secretary of State.
First, determine goals, then evaluate which candidate is most likely to work towards those goals.
Three
John Quincy Adams
she had freedom of mind combined with purpose, a commanding voice, and nonchalant behavior towards non supporters for what ever circumstances.
It means to have a favorable attitude towards someone; to be already attracted to someone. For example, I can say, "Don't let him be the judge to decide between candidate A and candidate B because the guy has a soft spot in his heart for candidate B and cannot be trusted with an objective and honest choice between the two."
There is one question that involves Senator Sanders that has seemed to slip under the radar scope of the news media and among other politicians that either support Senator Sanders or that oppose him. Clearly the "main stream" of the Democrat Party leans more towards the policies of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton then those of Senator Sanders. Also, on the Republican side, liberal, moderate and conservative politicians also are on opposite poles then Senator Sanders. With all that said, how can Senator Sanders refer to himself as a socialist? Socialists believe that the major means of production in a democratic socialist nation are owned and controlled by the central government under the name of all the people. Senator Sanders has not proposed one area of the US mixed market economy that he would socialize. With that said, it can be generous to say that the senator "prefers socialism" however, he recognizes that: 1. Very few people in the US are socialists; and 2. No one in either of the major political party has proposed a government takeover of the banking system as an example, simply as a measure to improve the economy and does not claim that such a move would be part of a socialist agenda. Senator Sanders, if he were to be elected to the US presidency would be an advocate of increased social expenditures, such as reduced college fees or free college. This measure would never pass Congress. Senator Sanders believes that increased social programs would be paid for by raising taxes. Yet as it has been pointed out time and time again, that if all the wealth of the top 5% of Americans, would be confiscated to help pay for new programs or to reduce the national debt, this would amount to nothing. Raising it to the top 10% would also not make a dent in the national debt of about $20 trillion. With all of that said, the answer to the original question is that if Senator Sanders was elected to the US presidency, he would be an advocate of increased taxes and more social benefits. There is nothing wrong with that "idea" except that it most likely is not workable.
Not all people will feel hate towards Hillary Clinton, some people will really like her and think she is a good presidential candidate. As a politician in a democratic election, people's feelings towards her will be coloured by their own political ideas and preferences. However, no matter what your feelings it is important to remember she is a real person and should not be maligned. Think before you believe the things some people may say about her (both good and bad).
First see your dentist to make sure that you are a candidate for home whitening. Follow their recommendations, which may be just a special toothpaste.